Cited by 206Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent.

Roskos-Ewoldsen, Beverly, McNamara, Timothy P., Shelton, Amy L., Carr, Walter·1998·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Previous research on spatial memory indicated that memories of small layouts were orientation dependent (orientation specific) but that memories of large layouts were orientation independent (orientation free). Two experiments investigated the relation between layout size and orientation dependency. Participants learned a small or a large 4-point path (Experiment 1) or a large display of objects (Experiment 2) and then made judgments of relative direction from imagined headings that were either the same as or different from the single studied orientation. Judgments were faster and more accurate when the imagined heading was the same as the studied orientation (i.e., aligned) than when the imagined heading differed from the studied orientation (i.e., misaligned). This alignment effect was present for both small and large layouts. These results indicate that location is encoded in an orientation-dependent manner regardless of layout size.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.215

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L., & Carr, W.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
1998
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
215-226
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2137912646
Cited by
206
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
26.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH15792, T32MH015792)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
spatial memory, mental representation, location encoding, path learning
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Orientation, Reaction Time, Size Perception, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review