CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developmental Improvement and Age-Related Decline in Unfamiliar Face Matching

Megreya, Ahmed M, Bindemann, Markus·2015·Perception
DOI 10.1068/p7825
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Age-related changes have been documented widely in studies of face recognition and eyewitness identification. However, it is not clear whether these changes arise from general developmental differences in memory or occur specifically during the perceptual processing of faces. We report two experiments to track such perceptual changes using a 1-in-10 (experiment 1) and 1-in-1 (experiment 2) matching task for unfamiliar faces. Both experiments showed improvements in face matching during childhood and adult-like accuracy levels by adolescence. In addition, face-matching performance declined in adults of the age of 65 years. These findings indicate that developmental improvements and aging-related differences in face processing arise from changes in the perceptual encoding of faces. A clear face inversion effect was also present in all age groups. This indicates that those age-related changes in face matching reflect a quantitative effect, whereby typical face processes are engaged but do not operate at the best-possible level. These data suggest that part of the problem of eyewitness identification in children and elderly persons might reflect impairments in the perceptual processing of unfamiliar faces.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p7825

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bartlett J. C., 2006, Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people, 309
  2. Geiselman R. E., 2001, American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19, 77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Megreya, A. M., & Bindemann, M.
Affiliations
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Megreya, Ahmed M
ORCID
Venue
Perception
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2015-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
5-22
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
DOI
10.1068/p7825
OpenAlex
W1989506694
Cited by
53
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), aging, developmental changes, eyewitness identification, face inversion effect, perceptual coding, childhood, older adults, face perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Child, Face, Female, Humans, Human Development, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review