Cited by 395Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories.

Open access
Scherf, K. Suzanne, Behrmann, Marlene, Humphreys, Kate, Luna, Beatriz·2007·Developmental Science

Abstract

The organization of category-selective regions in ventral visual cortex is well characterized in human adults. We investigated a crucial, previously unaddressed, question about how this organization emerges developmentally. We contrasted the developmental trajectories for face-, object-, and place-selective activation in the ventral visual cortex in children, adolescents, and adults. Although children demonstrated adult-like organization in object- and place-related cortex, as a group they failed to show consistent face-selective activation in classical face regions. The lack of a consistent neural signature for faces was attributable to (1) reduced face-selectivity and extent of activation within the regions that will become the FFA, OFA, and STS in adults, and (2) smaller volumes and considerable variability in the locus of face-selective activation in individual children. In contrast, adolescents showed an adult-like pattern of face-selective activation, although it was more right-lateralized. These findings reveal critical age-related differences in the emergence of category-specific functional organization in the visual cortex and support a model of brain development in which specialization emerges from interactions between experience-dependent learning and the maturing brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00595.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The volume changes contrast with face-sensitive cortex reports, where younger groups have smaller clusters than adults and adolescents fall between.

    “These changes differ from the reports in face-sensitive cortex, which present smaller activated clusters in younger age groups compared with adults, with adolescents somewhere in between (Golarai et al., 2007, 2010; Scherf et al., 2007).”

    From The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms (2011) · cites this paper as Scherf et al., 2007

  • Volume changes in fMRI activations are documented for face processing, but no comparable data exist for the VWFA.

    “Developmental changes in the volume of fMRI activations have been recorded in the domain of face processing (Golarai, Liberman, Yoon, & Grill-Spector, 2010; Golarai et al., 2007; Scherf, Behrmann, Humphreys, & Luna, 2007), but to our knowledge, there are no data on parallel changes in the VWFA.”

    From The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms (2011) · cites this paper as Scherf et al., 2007

  • In Scherf et al. (2007), no further changes in functional specificity for face processing were noted between adolescence and adulthood, but activity became more bilateral with age.

    “In this study, no further changes in functional specificity for face processing were noted between adolescence and adulthood, but activity became more bilateral with age.”
  • In Scherf et al. (2007), an age-related increase in size of face-selective FFA was observed between childhood and adolescence, as well as an increase in face-selective superior temporal sulcus (STS).

    “an age-related increase in size of face-selective FFA was observed between childhood and adolescence, as well as an increase in face-selective superior temporal sulcus (STS) (Scherf et al., 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., Humphreys, K., & Luna, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Scherf, K. Suzanne
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
F15-30
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2004995289
Cited by
395
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD049354, U19HD035469)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
ventral visual cortex, face agnosia, fusiform face area, superior temporal sulcus, brain development, children, adolescents, age differences, laterality, experience-dependent learning, functional specialization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Brain Mapping, Child, Child, Preschool, Critical Period, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review