Offsets required to reduce the carbon balance of sheep and beef farms through carbon sequestration in trees and soils.
Abstract
The sustainability of farming is important to ensure that natural resources remain available into the future. Ruminant livestock production generates more greenhouse gas emissions than other types of agricultural production and most livestock mitigation options to date have a modest greenhouse gas reduction potential ( 20 DSE/ha) has yet to be studied in Australia. The challenge is to sequester enough carbon to offset the higher level of emissions that these higher stocked farms produce. This study calculated the carbon balance of wool, prime lamb and beef enterprises using a range of stocking rates (6–22 DSE/ha) and levels of tree cover in two agroecological zones. Emissions from livestock, energy and transport were offset by the carbon sequestered in trees and soils. Additionally, the carbon balance was calculated of a case study, Jigsaw Farms, an intensive sheep and beef farm in south-eastern Australia. The methods used to calculate emissions and carbon stocks were from the Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. The majority of stocking rates were carbon positive over a 25-year period when 20% of the sheep or beef enterprises were covered with trees. This study demonstrated that substantial reductions can be made in greenhouse gas emissions through the use of carbon sequestration, particularly in trees. The results showed that from 2000 to 2014 Jigsaw Farms reduced its emissions by 48% by sequestering carbon in trees and soil. The analysis of different stocking rate…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jigsaw Farms was net zero between 2010 and 2017.
“The study by Doran-Browne et al. (2018), and sequestration data from this study estimate that Jigsaw Farms was net zero between 2010 and 2017 (shaded in Table 1).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
A previous assessment in 2018 estimated that Hensley Park achieved zero net emissions between 2010 and 2014.
“A previous assessment in 2018 estimated that the Hensley Park property achieved zero net emissions between 2010 and 2014 (Doran-Browne et al. 2018).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
The previous carbon assessment (Doran-Browne et al. 2018) for the property was for the Hensley park property only.
“The previous carbon assessment (Doran-Browne et al. 2018) for the property was for the Hensley park property only.”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
The emissions from the enterprise and the emissions intensity of beef, sheep meat and wool were calculated using the sheep and beef greenhouse accounting framework tool (SB-GAFv2.3).
“The emissions from the enterprise and the emissions intensity of beef, sheep meat and wool were calculated using the sheep and beef greenhouse accounting framework tool (SB-GAFv2.3)(Doran-Browne et al. 2018).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
On average, livestock emissions and sequestration were respectively 2.6 and 1.6 times lower in Doran-Browne et al. (2018) than calculated in the current assessment.
“A comparison indicates that on average, livestock emissions and sequestration were respectively 2.6 and 1.6 times lower in Doran-Browne et al. (2018), than calculated in the current assessment (Table 1).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
In Doran-Browne et al. (2018), total gross emissions ranged from 2336 t CO2-e in 2000 to a maximum of 8520 t CO2-e in 2006, declining to 4805 t CO2-e in 2014.
“which ranged from 2336 t CO 2 -e in 2000,”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
Total gross emissions in the current assessment were higher than those in Doran-Browne et al. (2018).
“Total gross emissions were higher than the assessment by Doran-Browne et al. (2018), which ranged from 2336 t CO 2 -e in 2000,”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
The previous assessment indicated that livestock and farm practice emissions would exceed annual rates of carbon sequestration from 2017 onwards.
“This assessment indicated that soil and tree sequestration rates would decline over time as soil carbon reached maximum potential and tree growth rates slowed, and that livestock and farm practice emissions would exceed annual rates of carbon sequestration from 2017 onwards.”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
The previous assessment indicated that soil and tree sequestration rates would decline over time as soil carbon reached maximum potential and tree growth rates slowed.
“This assessment indicated that soil and tree sequestration rates would decline over time as soil carbon reached maximum potential and tree growth rates slowed, and that livestock and farm practice emissions would exceed annual rates of carbon sequestration from 2017 onwards.”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
In the previous assessment, Hensley Park was calculated to have achieved net zero between 2010 and 2014.
“In the previous assessment, Hensley Park was calculated to have achieved net zero between 2010 and 2014 (Table 1) (Doran-Browne et al. 2018).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
Estimated tree carbon sequestration in the current assessment is higher than previous modelling by Doran-Browne et al. (2018).
“Estimated tree carbon sequestration is also higher than previous modelling by Doran-Browne et al. (2018), where tree sequestration was estimated at -37,003 t CO 2 -e from 2000 to 2014, with a peak of -5104 t CO 2 -e in 2011 Table 1).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
In Doran-Browne et al. (2018), tree sequestration was estimated at -37,003 t CO2-e from 2000 to 2014, with a peak of -5104 t CO2-e in 2011.
“where tree sequestration was estimated at -37,003 t CO 2 -e from 2000 to 2014, with a peak of -5104 t CO 2 -e in 2011 Table 1).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Doran-Browne et al. 2018
Cites
Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence
Pretty, J. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2163 · Cited by 1,941 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Received 13 July 2016, accepted 14 March 2017, published online 16 May 2017 Introduction The sustainability of farming has become an important focus of research to ensure that natural resources remain available, underpinning food production into the future (Pretty 2008).”
BackgroundGreenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A. N., Gerber, P., Gill, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2925 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Garnett, T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing?
Macdonald, A., Court, J., Meyer, R., Wootton, M., Kantor, E., Keenan, R., Stewart, H., & Eckard, R. (2025) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an24346 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Doran-Browne, N., Wootton, M., Taylor, C., & Eckard, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- BJigsaw Farms, 1874 Hensley Park Road, Hensley Park, Vic. 3301, Australia.
- Corresponding author
- Doran-Browne, Natalie
- Venue
- Animal Production Science
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2017-05-16
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1648-1655
- ISSN
- 1836-0939 (ISSN-L)
- 1836-5787
- OpenAlex
- W2614265720
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Production Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Meat and Livestock Australia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- carbon balance, carbon offsetting, carbon sequestration, sheep farming, beef production, stocking rate, tree cover, soil carbon, greenhouse gas emissions, ruminant livestock, wool, agro-ecological zones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review