The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field Scanalyzer: An automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Current approaches to field phenotyping are laborious or permit the use of only a few sensors at a time. In an effort to overcome this, a fully automated robotic field phenotyping platform with a dedicated sensor array that may be accurately positioned in three dimensions and mounted on fixed rails has been established, to facilitate continual and high-throughput monitoring of crop performance. Employed sensors comprise of high-resolution visible, chlorophyll fluorescence and thermal infrared cameras, two hyperspectral imagers and dual 3D laser scanners. The sensor array facilitates specific growth measurements and identification of key growth stages with dense temporal and spectral resolution. Together, this platform produces a detailed description of canopy development across the crops entire lifecycle, with a high-degree of accuracy and reproducibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead
Pingali, P. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912953109 · Cited by 2,442
Breeding Technologies to Increase Crop Production in a Changing World
Tester, M., & Langridge, P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183700 · Cited by 2,322
Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications
Murchie, E. H., & Lawson, T. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert208 · Cited by 2,195
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
A Review of Imaging Techniques for Plant Phenotyping
Li, L., Zhang, Q., & Huang, D. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s141120078 · Cited by 1,094
Cobb, J. N., DeClerck, G., Greenberg, A., Clark, R., & McCouch, S. (2013) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0 · Cited by 666
Jones, H. G., Serraj, R., Loveys, B. R., Xiong, L., Wheaton, A., & Price, A. H. (2009) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp09123 · Cited by 577
Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research
White, J. W., Andrade-Sanchez, P., Gore, M. A., Bronson, K. F., Coffelt, T. A., Conley, M. M., Feldmann, K. A., French, A. N., Heun, J. T., Hunsaker, D. J., et al. (2012) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.003 · Cited by 575
Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review
Sankaran, S., Khot, L. R., Espinoza, C. Z., Jarolmasjed, S., Sathuvalli, V. R., Vandemark, G. J., Miklas, P. N., Carter, A. H., Pumphrey, M. O., Knowles, N. R., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.004 · Cited by 507
Maes, W. H., & Steppe, K. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ers165 · Cited by 488
Proximal Remote Sensing Buggies and Potential Applications for Field-Based Phenotyping
Deery, D., Jimenez-Berni, J., Jones, H., Sirault, X., & Furbank, R. (2014) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy4030349 · Cited by 384
Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders?
Passioura, J. B. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12079 · Cited by 306
Practical issues of hyperspectral imaging analysis of solid dosage forms
Amigo, J. M. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3828-z · Cited by 207
Casadesús, J., Kaya, Y., Bort, J., Nachit, M. M., Araus, J. L., Amor, S., Ferrazzano, G., Maalouf, F., Maccaferri, M., Martos, V., et al. (2007) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00116.x · Cited by 197
A Mixed Modelling Approach for Randomized Experiments with Repeated Measures
Piepho, H. P., Büchse, A., & Richter, C. (2004) · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science · doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2004.00097.x · Cited by 196
Guo, W., Rage, U. K., & Ninomiya, S. (2013) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.04.010 · Cited by 191
Paulus, S., Dupuis, J., Mahlein, A.-K., & Kuhlmann, H. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-238 · Cited by 182
Evolutionary Biology for the 21st Century
Losos, J. B., Arnold, S. J., Bejerano, G., Brodie, E. D., Hibbett, D., Hoekstra, H. E., Mindell, D. P., Monteiro, A., Moritz, C., Orr, H. A., et al. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001466 · Cited by 168
Römer, C., Wahabzada, M., Ballvora, A., Pinto, F., Rossini, M., Panigada, C., Behmann, J., Léon, J., Thurau, C., Bauckhage, C., et al. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12060 · Cited by 160
Capolupo, A., Kooistra, L., Berendonk, C., Boccia, L., & Suomalainen, J. M. (2015) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi4042792 · Cited by 154
Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean
Rascher, U., Bloßfeld, S., Fiorani, F., Jahnke, S., Jansen, M., Kuhn, A. J., Matsubara, S., Märtin, L. L. A., Merchant, A., Metzner, R., et al. (2011) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp11164 · Cited by 150
Comar, A., Burger, P., de Solan, B., Baret, F., Daumard, F., & Hanocq, J. F. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12065 · Cited by 114
Gonzalez-Dugo, V., Hernández, P., Solís, I., & Zarco‐Tejada, P. J. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs71013586 · Cited by 113
Scaling of Thermal Images at Different Spatial Resolution: The Mixed Pixel Problem
Jones, H. G., & Sirault, X. R. R. (2014) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy4030380 · Cited by 99
Römer, C., Bürling, K., Hunsche, M., Rumpf, T., Noga, G. J., & Plümer, L. (2011) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2011.09.011 · Cited by 98
Kipp, S., Mistele, B., & Schmidhalter, U. (2013) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp13221 · Cited by 78
Proximal hyperspectral sensing and data analysis approaches for field-based plant phenomics
Thorp, K. R., Gore, M. A., Andrade-Sánchez, P., Carmo‐Silva, E., Welch, S. M., White, J. W., & French, A. N. (2015) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.005 · Cited by 77
Kuśnierek, K., & Korsæth, A. (2015) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.001 · Cited by 41
Cited by
Remote sensing for agricultural applications: A meta-review
Weiss, M., Jacob, F., & Duveiller, G. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111402 · Cited by 1,877
Yang, W., Feng, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Doonan, J. H., Batchelor, W. D., Xiong, L., & Yan, J. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.008 · Cited by 961
Yang, G., Liu, J., Zhao, C., Li, Z., Huang, Y., Yu, H., Xu, B., Yang, X., Zhu, D., Zhang, X., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01111 · Cited by 767
Plant Phenomics, From Sensors to Knowledge
Tardieu, F., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Pridmore, T., & Bennett, M. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.055 · Cited by 614
Uncovering the hidden half of plants using new advances in root phenotyping
Atkinson, J. A., Pound, M. P., Bennett, M. J., & Wells, D. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.06.002 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Virlet, N., Sabermanesh, K., Sadeghi-Tehran, P., & Hawkesford, M. J.
- Venue
- Functional Plant Biology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2016-11-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-153
- ISSN
- 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-4416
- OpenAlex
- W2518417964
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 27.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
