Cited by 45Avian ecology and behaviorOil Spill Detection and MitigationMarine animal studies overview

Differences in breeding success between African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) that were and were not oiled in the MV Treasure oil-spill in 2000

Barham, Peter J., Underhill, Les G., Crawford, Robert J. M., Leshoro, T. Mario·2007·Emu - Austral Ornithology

Abstract

About 19000 African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) were oiled when the bulk ore carrier MV Treasure sank off the west coast of South Africa in June 2000. Of these, more than 17000 Penguins were cleaned, rehabilitated and released back to the wild. The breeding success of these birds was compared with unoiled birds and birds oiled during other oil-spills, by measuring fecundity, hatching success and fledging success from 2001 to 2005 on Robben Island. Fledging success averaged 61% in birds that were not oiled in the Treasure spill and 43% in birds oiled during the Treasure event, with a large proportion of the reduction attributable to higher mortality of older chicks. Factors that may have contributed to differential fledging success include long mean intervals between capture and cleaning (22 days) and between capture and release (48 days) for birds oiled in the Treasure spill. One implication of these results is, if a similar large spill should occur in the future, every effort should be made to treat the oiled birds as quickly as possible to reduce the risk of their suffering a similar reduction in breeding productivity. Further, the other interventions, such as relocation of unoiled birds and captive-rearing of orphaned chicks may need to receive higher priority than hitherto.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/mu06028

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barham, P. J., Underhill, L. G., Crawford, R. J. M., & Leshoro, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Robben Island Museum, Robben Island 7400, South Africa.
Corresponding author
Barham, Peter J.
Venue
Emu - Austral Ornithology
Published
2007-03
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
7-13
ISSN
  • 0158-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5540
OpenAlex
W2124478584
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emu - Austral Ornithology (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Earthwatch Institute
  • National Research Foundation
  • Bristol, Clifton and West of England Zoological Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
African penguin, Spheniscus demersus, oiling, seabird rehabilitation, breeding success, fledging success, hatching success, fecundity, chick mortality, Robben Island, oil spill response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review