Cited by 17Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewMarine and fisheries research

Processes influencing the population dynamics and conservation of African penguins on Dyer Island, South Africa

Ludynia, K, Waller, LJ, Sherley, RB, Abadi, F, Galada, Y, Geldenhuys, D, Crawford, RJM, Shannon, LJ +1 more·2014·African Journal of Marine Science

Abstract

Dyer Island, South Africa, supported the largest African penguin Spheniscus demersus colony in 1979 (22 655 breeding pairs), but population dynamics of the species have not followed the trends of adjacent colonies in years of high fish abundance or shifts in prey distribution. Less than 1 500 pairs were breeding on Dyer Island in 2013. Available knowledge on demographic parameters was collated and ecological processes were quantified. Juvenile and adult survival probabilities estimated for birds ringed on Dyer Island between 2005 and 2011 were 0.247 (SE 0.06) and 0.545 (SE 0.05) respectively. Juveniles had a high probability (0.918; SE 0.077) of moving away from Dyer Island. Predation by seals and kelp gulls, as well as oiling, are currently important top-down pressures on penguins on Dyer Island. Numbers of birds breeding on the island were negatively correlated with purse-seine catches 20 nautical miles around it. However, it seems that once the colony size is <3 500 breeding pairs, the importance of fishing pressure diminishes, suggesting that once a colony has been reduced to a relatively small size, its growth is limited by pressures other than fishing. From the review of available knowledge presented here, we recommend a number of management options that should be tested in a suitable model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2989/1814232x.2014.929027

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ludynia, K., Waller, L., Sherley, R., Abadi, F., Galada, Y., Geldenhuys, D., Crawford, R., Shannon, L., & Jarre, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Scientific Services (ZA)
  • Marine Research Institute, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
Corresponding author
Ludynia, K
Venue
African Journal of Marine Science
Published
2014-04-03
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
253-267
ISSN
  • 1814-232X (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-2338
OpenAlex
W2005668638
Cited by
17
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
African Journal of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Claude Leon Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
African penguin, Spheniscus demersus, population dynamics, colony decline, survival probability, natal dispersal, seal predation, oiling, fishing pressure, purse seine catch, seabird conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review