The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves
Abstract
The importance of both stomatal closure and reduced carboxylation efficiency on the photo- synthesis decline in response to long term water stress was previously measured in field-grown grapevines. Here we address the question of whether water stress affects the photochemical capacity of leaves, measuring gas-exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence under drought and moderate irrigat- ion at intervals through the summer season during three consecutive years. We conclude that usually water stress does not induce photoinhibition in field-grown grapevines, even when stomatal conductance and photosynthesis are reduced to very low values. Moreover, down-regulat- ion of photochemical reactions is low, leading to a general pattern of photosynthetic response to drought consistent in large reductions of stomatal conductance ( g ), followed by a consistent decrease of CO2 assimilation ( A ) but with a much lower effect on electron transport rate (ETR). In consequence, the intrinsic water-use efficiency ( A/g ) increased, as well as the ratio ETR/ A . It is suggested that increased electron transport to alternative pathways, such as photorespiration, prevented further down-regulation of ETR under drought conditions. These results are in agreement with our previous reports for potted plants. However it is clear that, under field conditions with a much more slowly developed water stress, ETR reductions are more attenuated than in potted plants, reducing their incidence in carbon assimilation, which seems to be mainly regulated by stomatal closure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FLEXAS, J., ESCALONA, J. M., & MEDRANO, H. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00371.x · Cited by 309
Self-citation
Cited by
Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x · Cited by 1,994
Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
FLEXAS, J. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf027 · Cited by 1,645
Self-citationBaker, N. R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh196 · Cited by 1,638
MEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
Self-citationFrequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues
Kalaji, H. M., Schansker, G., Ladle, R. J., Goltsev, V., Bosa, K., Allakhverdiev, S. I., Brestic, M., Bussotti, F., Calatayud, A., Dąbrowski, P., et al. (2014) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-014-0024-6 · Cited by 832
Metadata
- Authors
- Flexas, J., Escalona, J. M., & Medrano, H.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1999-01-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 893-900
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W2314900774
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp98054
- The paper
- Flexas, J., Escalona, J. M., & Medrano, H. (1999). Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp98054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.