Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Erythropoietin both protects from and reverses experimental diabetic neuropathy

Open access
Bianchi, Roberto, Buyukakilli, Belgin, Brines, Michael, Savino, Costanza, Cavaletti, Guido, Oggioni, Norberto, Lauria, Giuseppe, Borgna, Monica, Lombardi, Raffaella, Cimen, Burak, Comelekoglu, Ulku, Kanik, Arzu, Tataroglu, Cengiz, Cerami, Anthony, Ghezzi, Pietro·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Erythropoietin (EPO) possesses generalized neuroprotective and neurotrophic actions. We tested the efficacy of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) in preventing and reversing nerve dysfunction in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes in rats. Two days after STZ [60 mg/kg of body weight (b.w.), i.p.], diabetic animals were administered rhEPO (40 μg/kg of b.w.) three times weekly for 5 weeks either immediately (preventive) before or after a 5-week delay (therapeutic) after induction of hyperglycemia or at a lower dose (8 μg/kg of b.w. once per week) for 8 weeks (prolonged). Tail-nerve conduction velocities (NCV) was assessed at 5 and 11 weeks for the preventive and therapeutic schedule, respectively. Compared to nondiabetic rats, NCV was 20% lower after 5 weeks in the STZ group, and this decrease was attenuated 50% by rhEPO. Furthermore, the reduction of Na + ,K + -ATPase activity of diabetic nerves (by 55%) was limited to 24% in the rhEPO-treated group. In the therapeutic schedule, NCV was reduced by 50% after 11 weeks but by only 23% in the rhEPO-treated group. rhEPO treatment attenuated the decrease in compound muscle action potential in diabetic rats. In addition, rhEPO treatment was associated with a preservation of footpad cutaneous innervation, as assessed by protein gene product 9.5 immunostaining. Diabetic rats developed alterations in mechanical and thermal nociception, which were partially reversed by rhEPO given either in a preventative or therapeutic manner. These observations suggest that administration of rhEPO or its analogues may be useful in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0307823100

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Bianchi, R., Buyukakilli, B., Brines, M., Savino, C., Cavaletti, G., Oggioni, N., Lauria, G., Borgna, M., Lombardi, R., Cimen, B., Comelekoglu, U., Kanik, A., Tataroglu, C., Cerami, A., & Ghezzi, P.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-01-12
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
823-828
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1980093324
Cited by
248
References
3
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erythropoietin both protects from and reverses experimental diabetic neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0307823100
The paper
Bianchi, R., Buyukakilli, B., Brines, M., Savino, C., Cavaletti, G., Oggioni, N., Lauria, G., Borgna, M., Lombardi, R., Cimen, B., Comelekoglu, U., Kanik, A., Tataroglu, C., Cerami, A., & Ghezzi, P. (2004). Erythropoietin both protects from and reverses experimental diabetic neuropathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307823100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.