The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mouse olfactory receptor gene family
Open accessAbstract
In mammals, odor detection in the nose is mediated by a diverse family of olfactory receptors (ORs), which are used combinatorially to detect different odorants and encode their identities. The OR family can be divided into subfamilies whose members are highly related and are likely to recognize structurally related odorants. To gain further insight into the mechanisms underlying odor detection, we analyzed the mouse OR gene family. Exhaustive searches of a mouse genome database identified 913 intact OR genes and 296 OR pseudogenes. These genes were localized to 51 different loci on 17 chromosomes. Sequence comparisons showed that the mouse OR family contains 241 subfamilies. Subfamily sizes vary extensively, suggesting that some classes of odorants may be more easily detected or discriminated than others. Determination of subfamilies that contain ORs with identified ligands allowed tentative functional predictions for 19 subfamilies. Analysis of the chromosomal locations of members of each subfamily showed that many OR gene loci encode only one or a few subfamilies. Furthermore, most subfamilies are encoded by a single locus, suggesting that different loci may encode receptors for different types of odorant structural features. Comparison of human and mouse OR subfamilies showed that the two species have many, but not all, subfamilies in common. However, mouse subfamilies are usually larger than their human counterparts. This finding suggests that humans and mice recognize many of the same odorant structural motifs, but mice may be superior in odor sensitivity and discrimination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
Self-citation
Cited by
Concerted and Birth-and-Death Evolution of Multigene Families
Nei, M., & Rooney, A. P. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240 · Cited by 1,298
Atypical Membrane Topology and Heteromeric Function of Drosophila Odorant Receptors In Vivo
Benton, R., Sachse, S., Michnick, S. W., & Vosshall, L. B. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040020 · Cited by 1,015
A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium
Liberles, S. D., & Buck, L. B. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05066 · Cited by 791
Self-citation“Control” laboratory rodents are metabolically morbid: Why it matters
Martin, B., Ji, S., Maudsley, S., & Mattson, M. P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912955107 · Cited by 354
The role of the microbiome in the neurobiology of social behaviour
Sarkar, A., Harty, S., Johnson, K. V. ‐., Moeller, A. H., Carmody, R. N., Lehto, S. M., Erdman, S. E., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Burnet, P. W. J. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12603 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Godfrey, P. A., Malnic, B., & Buck, L. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-02-09
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2156-2161
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2061793455
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mouse olfactory receptor gene family. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0308051100
- The paper
- Godfrey, P. A., Malnic, B., & Buck, L. B. (2004). The mouse olfactory receptor gene family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308051100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.