Cited by 209Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: Implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences

Open access
Harvati, Katerina, Frost, Stephen R., McNulty, Kieran P.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The taxonomic status of Neanderthals lies at the center of the modern human origins debate. Proponents of the single-origin model often view this group as a distinct species with little or no contribution to the evolution of modern humans. Adherents to the regional continuity model consider Neanderthals a subspecies or population of Homo sapiens , which contributed significantly to the evolution of early modern Europeans. Paleontologists generally agree that fossil species should be equivalent to extant ones in the amount of their morphological variation. Recognition of fossil species therefore hinges on analogy to living species. A previous study by one of the authors and recent work by other researchers [Schillachi, M. A. & Froelich, J. W. (2001) Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 115, 157–166] have supported specific status for Neanderthals based on analogy to chimpanzees and Sulawesi macaques, respectively. However, these taxa may not be the most appropriate models for Pleistocene humans. Here we test the hypothesis that Neanderthals represent a subspecies of H. sapiens by comparing the degree of their morphological differentiation from modern humans to that found within and between 12 species of extant primates. The model taxa comprised >1,000 specimens, including phylogenetic (modern humans and African apes) and ecological (eight papionin taxa) models for Pleistocene humans. Morphological distances between model taxon pairs were compared to the distances between Neanderthals and modern humans obtained by using a randomization technique. Results strongly support a specific distinction for Neanderthals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0308085100

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modern humans have a high degree of cranial variation exceeding that found in other primate species, with the face being an important contributor to this variation.

    “modern humans have a high degree of cranial variation exceeding that found in other primate species, with the face being an important contributor to this variation 75,76”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [76]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvati, K., Frost, S. R., & McNulty, K. P.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-01-26
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
1147-1152
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2072524414
Cited by
209
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
136.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
Neanderthals, species status, modern human origins, human, chimpanzees, morphological distance
MeSH terms
Animals, Ecology, Female, Humans, Male, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Primates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review