Cited by 64Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

Neonatal postcrania from Mezmaiskaya, Russia, and Le Moustier, France, and the development of Neandertal body form

Open access
Weaver, Timothy D., Coqueugniot, Hélène, Golovanova, Liubov V., Doronichev, Vladimir B., Maureille, Bruno, Hublin, Jean-Jacques·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: One of the oldest questions in human evolutionary studies is: why do Neandertals look different from present-day and ancient modern humans? This question can be addressed at different levels, but a critical component of a complete answer is understanding the developmental basis of adult differences. We now know that many skull differences are present by the time of birth. We know less, however, about the developmental basis of differences in the rest of the body. By studying the two most complete Neandertal neonates, we were able to establish that, as for the skull, many differences in body form are present by the time of birth. Neandertals largely look like Neandertals, regardless of age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1523677113

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Arsuaga JL, et al. (2007) New Neandertal remains from CovaNegra (Valencia, Spain). J Hum Evol 52(1):31-58.
  2. Trinkaus E (1981) Neanderthal limb proportions and cold adaptation. Aspects of Human Evolution, Symposia of the Society for the Study of Human Biology, ed Stringer CB (Taylor and Francis, London), Vol 21, pp 187-224.
  3. Harcourt AH (2012) Human Biogeography (Univ California Press, Berkeley), p 328.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weaver, T. D., Coqueugniot, H., Golovanova, L. V., Doronichev, V. B., Maureille, B., & Hublin, J.-J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Laboratory of Prehistory, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
113
Issue
23
Pages
6472-6477
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2402117556
Cited by
64
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 3
FWCI
44.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR- 10-LABX-52, 10-LABX-52, ANR-10)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Conseil Régional Aquitaine (ANR-10-LABX-52)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
body shape evolution, morphometrics
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthropometry, Bone and Bones, Female, France, Humans, Male, Russia, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review