Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examination of hypotheses for the Permo–Triassic boundary extinction by carbon cycle modeling

Open access
Berner, Robert A.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The biological extinction that occurred at the Permian–Triassic boundary represents the most extensive loss of species of any known event of the past 550 million years. There have been a wide variety of explanations offered for this extinction. In the present paper, a number of the more popular recent hypotheses are evaluated in terms of predictions that they make, or that they imply, concerning the global carbon cycle. For this purpose, a mass balance model is used that calculates atmospheric CO 2 and oceanic δ 13 C as a function of time. Hypotheses considered include: ( i ) the release of massive amounts of CO 2 from the ocean to the atmosphere resulting in mass poisoning; ( ii ) the release of large amounts of CO 2 from volcanic degassing; ( iii ) the release of methane stored in methane hydrates; ( iv ) the decomposition and oxidation of dead organisms to CO 2 after sudden mass mortality; and ( v ) the long-term reorganization of the global carbon cycle. The modeling indicates that measured short-term changes in δ 13 C at the boundary are best explained by methane release with mass mortality and volcanic degassing contributing in secondary roles. None of the processes result in excessively high levels of atmospheric CO 2 if they occurred on time scales of more than about 1,000 years. The idea of poisoning by high levels of atmospheric CO 2 depends on the absence of subthermocline calcium carbonate deposition during the latest Permian. The most far-reaching effect was found to be reorganization of the carbon cycle with major sedimentary burial of organic matter shifting from the land to the sea, resulting in less burial overall, decreased atmospheric O 2 , and higher atmospheric CO 2 for the entire Triassic Period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.032095199

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Berner, R. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-03-26
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
4172-4177
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2133160033
Cited by
382
References
7
FWCI
20.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examination of hypotheses for the Permo–Triassic boundary extinction by carbon cycle modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.032095199
The paper
Berner, R. A. (2002). Examination of hypotheses for the Permo–Triassic boundary extinction by carbon cycle modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032095199

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.