Cited by 494Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Biomineralization and Evolutionary History

Knoll, A. H.·2003·Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry

Abstract

Research Article| January 03, 2003 Biomineralization and Evolutionary History Andrew H. Knoll Andrew H. Knoll Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138 U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2003) 54 (1): 329–356. https://doi.org/10.2113/0540329 Article history first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Andrew H. Knoll; Biomineralization and Evolutionary History. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2003;; 54 (1): 329–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/0540329 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search The Dutch ethologist Niko Tinbergen famously distinguished between proximal and ultimate explanations in biology. Proximally, biologists seek a mechanistic understanding of how organisms function; most of this volume addresses the molecular and physiological bases of biomineralization. But while much of biology might be viewed as a particularly interesting form of chemistry, it is more than that. Biology is chemistry with a history, requiring that proximal explanation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2113/0540329

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The demonstration of L. fasciculata producing thicker, metabolically demanding organophosphatic sclerites in a multi-element scleritome over time illustrates that the cost of increased resources was likely offset by the increased chance of deterring perforating predators.

    “The demonstration of L. fasciculata producing thicker, metabolically demanding organophosphatic sclerites in a multi-element scleritome over time illustrates that the cost of increased resources was likely offset by the increased chance of deterring perforating predators.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knoll, A. H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Knoll, A. H.
Venue
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
329-356
ISSN
1529-6466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081129368
Cited by
494
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
biomineralization, evolutionary history, natural selection, skeleton

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review