The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of transplanted bone marrow cells to Purkinje neurons in human adult brains
Open accessAbstract
We show here that cells within human adult bone marrow can contribute to cells in the adult human brain. Cerebellar tissues from female patients with hematologic malignancies, who had received chemotherapy, radiation, and a bone marrow transplant, were analyzed. Brain samples were obtained at autopsy from female patients who received male (sex-mismatched) or female (sex-matched, control) bone marrow transplants. Cerebella were evaluated in 10-μm-thick, formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections that encompassed up to ≈50% of a human Purkinje nucleus. A total of 5,860 Purkinje cells from sex-mismatched females and 3,202 Purkinje cells from sex-matched females were screened for Y chromosomes by epifluorescence. Confocal laser scanning microscopy allowed definitive identification of the sex chromosomes within the morphologically distinct Purkinje cells. In the brains of females who received male bone marrow, four Purkinje neurons were found that contained an X and a Y chromosome and two other Purkinje neurons contained more than a diploid number of sex chromosomes. No Y chromosomes were detected in the brains of sex-matched controls. The total frequency of male bone marrow contribution to female Purkinje cells approximated 0.1%. This study demonstrates that although during human development Purkinje neurons are no longer generated after birth, cells within the bone marrow can contribute to these CNS neurons even in adulthood. The underlying mechanism may be caused either by generation de novo of Purkinje neurons from bone marrow-derived cells or by fusion of marrow-derived cells with existing recipient Purkinje neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changing potency by spontaneous fusion
Ying, Q.-L., Nichols, J., Evans, E. P., & Smith, A. G. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature729 · Cited by 1,494
Perivascular microglial cells of the CNS are bone marrow-derived and present antigen in vivo
Hickey, W. F., & Kimura, H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3276004 · Cited by 1,466
Kempermann, G., Gast, D., & Gage, F. H. (2002) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10262 · Cited by 889
Cited by
Kucia, M., Reca, R., Miekus, K., Wanzeck, J., Wojakowski, W., Janowska‐Wieczorek, A., Ratajczak, J., & Ratajczak, M. Z. (2005) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2004-0342 · Cited by 759
Mesenchymal stem cells: paradoxes of passaging
Javazon, E. H., Beggs, K. J., & Flake, A. W. (2004) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2004.02.004 · Cited by 527
Weimann, J. M., Johansson, C. B., Trejo, A., & Blau, H. M. (2003) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1053 · Cited by 451
Self-citationMazini, L., Rochette, L., Amine, M., & Malka, G. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20102523 · Cited by 445
Lu, P., Blesch, A., & Tuszynski, M. H. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.20148 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Weimann, J. M., Charlton, C. A., Brazelton, T. R., Hackman, R. C., & Blau, H. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-02-07
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2088-2093
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126819846
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of transplanted bone marrow cells to Purkinje neurons in human adult brains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0337659100
- The paper
- Weimann, J. M., Charlton, C. A., Brazelton, T. R., Hackman, R. C., & Blau, H. M. (2003). Contribution of transplanted bone marrow cells to Purkinje neurons in human adult brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337659100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.