Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissecting the pathological effects of human Aβ40 and Aβ42 in Drosophila : A potential model for Alzheimer's disease

Iijima, Koichi, Liu, Hsin-Ping, Chiang, Ann-Shyn, Hearn, Stephen A., Konsolaki, Mary, Zhong, Yi·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides in the brain has been suggested to be the primary event in sequential progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we use Drosophila to examine whether expression of either the human Aβ40 or Aβ42 peptide in the Drosophila brain can induce pathological phenotypes resembling AD. The expression of Aβ42 led to the formation of diffused amyloid deposits, age-dependent learning defects, and extensive neurodegeneration. In contrast, expression of Aβ40 caused only age-dependent learning defects but did not lead to the formation of amyloid deposits or neurodegeneration. These results strongly suggest that accumulation of Aβ42 in the brain is sufficient to cause behavioral deficits and neurodegeneration. Moreover, Drosophila may serve as a model for facilitating the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying Aβ toxicity and the discovery of novel therapeutic targets for AD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0400895101

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.461 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.274.5284.99 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/35050103 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04050.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/383710a0 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/352239a0 · DOI
  8. Finelli A. L. Kelkar A. Song H.-J. Yang H. & Konsolaki M. (2004) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. in press.
  9. 10.1038/nature01506 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13703 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90024-8 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-07793.1999 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80215-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00496-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1039/an9931800401 · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.741131.x · DOI
  17. 10.1074/jbc.271.50.31894 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF01350033 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/35002593 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/cne.1365 · DOI
  21. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71041616.x · DOI
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07425.1997 · DOI
  23. Suzuki, N., Iwatsubo, T., Odaka, A., Ishibashi, Y., Kitada, C. & Ihara, Y. (1994) Am. J. Pathol. 145, 452-460.8053502
  24. 10.1016/0531-5565(78)90012-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.8303280 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.274.5295.2104 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/35079 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.85.11.4051 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90130-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4506 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00487-7 · DOI
  32. Davis K. L. & Samuels S. C. (1998) Pharmacological Management of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders (McGraw-Hill New York).
  33. 10.1016/0197-4580(95)00013-5 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1212/WNL.46.3.707 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/ana.410300410 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/70532 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.1062382 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00706-7 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081142 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/nm0198-097 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1073/pnas.261562998 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Iijima, K., Liu, H.-P., Chiang, A.-S., Hearn, S. A., Konsolaki, M., & Zhong, Y.
Affiliations
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; Department of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30043, Taiwan; and Department of Functional Genomics, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 556 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-04-06
Volume
101
Issue
17
Pages
6623-6628
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
440
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review