The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A rapid bioassay for single bacterial cell quantitation using bioconjugated nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
The rapid and sensitive determination of pathogenic bacteria is extremely important in biotechnology, medical diagnosis, and the current fight against bioterrorism. Current methods either lack ultrasensitivity or take a long time for analysis. Here, we report a bioconjugated nanoparticle-based bioassay for in situ pathogen quantification down to single bacterium within 20 min. The bioconjugated nanoparticle provides an extremely high fluorescent signal for bioanalysis and can be easily incorporated with biorecognition molecules, such as antibody. The antibody-conjugated nanoparticles can readily and specifically identify a variety of bacterium, such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, through antibody–antigen interaction and recognition. The single-bacterium-detection capability within 20 min has been confirmed by the plate-counting method and realized by using two independent optical techniques. The two detection methods correlated extremely well. Furthermore, we were able to detect multiple bacterial samples with high throughput by using a 384-well microplate format. To show the usefulness of this assay, we have accurately detected 1–400 E. coli O157 bacterial cells in spiked ground beef samples. Our results demonstrate the potential for a broad application of bioconjugated nanoparticles in practical biotechnological and medical applications in various biodetection systems. The ultimate power of integrating bionanotechnology into complex biological systems will emerge as a revolutionary tool for ultrasensitive detection of disease markers and infectious agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics
Rosi, N. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030067f · Cited by 4,603
Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges
Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpiński, T. M. (2021) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-021-03628-6 · Cited by 1,069
Nanotechnology for the Food and Bioprocessing Industries
Neethirajan, S., & Jayas, D. S. (2011) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-010-0328-2 · Cited by 593
Nanomaterials for targeted detection and photothermal killing of bacteria
Ray, P. C., Khan, S. A., Singh, A. K., Senapati, D., & Fan, Z. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15340h · Cited by 485
New Generation of Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Cancer Imaging and Therapy
Park, K., Lee, S., Kang, E., Kim, K., Choi, K., & Kwon, I. C. (2009) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.200801655 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., Hilliard, L. R., Mechery, S. J., Wang, Y., Bagwe, R. P., Jin, S., & Tan, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-10-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15027-15032
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2115068023
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A rapid bioassay for single bacterial cell quantitation using bioconjugated nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0404806101
- The paper
- Zhao, X., Hilliard, L. R., Mechery, S. J., Wang, Y., Bagwe, R. P., Jin, S., & Tan, W. (2004). A rapid bioassay for single bacterial cell quantitation using bioconjugated nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404806101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.