The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills
Open accessAbstract
The relationship between sensory sensitivity and reading performance was examined to test the hypothesis that the orthographic and phonological skills engaged in visual word recognition are constrained by the ability to detect dynamic visual and auditory events. A test battery using sensory psychophysics, psychometric tests, and measures of component literacy skills was administered to 32 unselected 10-year-old primary school children. The results suggest that children's sensitivity to both dynamic auditory and visual stimuli are related to their literacy skills. Importantly, after controlling for intelligence and overall reading ability, visual motion sensitivity explained independent variance in orthographic skill but not phonological ability, and auditory FM sensitivity covaried with phonological skill but not orthographic skill. These results support the hypothesis that sensitivity at detecting dynamic stimuli influences normal children's reading skills. Vision and audition separately may affect the ability to extract orthographic and phonological information during reading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90190-x · Cited by 2,947
Newsome, W., & Pare, E. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02201.1988 · Cited by 1,615
A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
van Orden, G. C. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197716 · Cited by 867
Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art.
Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1311 · Cited by 319
Research Note Transient Visual Attention is Dominated by the Magnocellular Stream
STEINMAN, B. A., STEINMAN, S. B., & LEHMKUHLE, S. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00151-4 · Cited by 139
Assessment of lexical and nonlexical reading abilities in children: Some normative data
Coltheart, M., & Leahy, J. (1996) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049539608259520 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9 · Cited by 1,914
Developmental Dyslexia and Specific Language Impairment: Same or Different?
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858 · Cited by 1,356
A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia
Goswami, U. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.001 · Cited by 912
The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia
Stein, J. (2001) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.186 · Cited by 872
Self-citationAmplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis
Goswami, U., Thomson, J., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S., & Scott, S. K. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122368599 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Talcott, J. B., Witton, C., McLean, M. F., Hansen, P. C., Rees, A., Green, G. G. R., & Stein, J. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-02-25
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2952-2957
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2084291719
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 31.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.040546597
- The paper
- Talcott, J. B., Witton, C., McLean, M. F., Hansen, P. C., Rees, A., Green, G. G. R., & Stein, J. F. (2000). Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040546597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
