Cited by 110Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationComputational Drug Discovery Methods

A systematic method for identifying small-molecule modulators of protein–protein interactions

Open access
Horswill, Alexander R., Savinov, Sergey N., Benkovic, Stephen J.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Discovering small-molecule modulators of protein–protein interactions is a challenging task because of both the generally noncontiguous, large protein surfaces that form these interfaces and the shortage of high-throughput approaches capable of identifying such rare inhibitors. We describe here a robust and flexible methodology that couples disruption of protein–protein complexes to host cell survival. The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated through monitoring a small-molecule-mediated protein–protein association (FKBP12–rapamycin–FRAP) and two cases of dissociation (homodimeric HIV-1 protease and heterodimeric ribonucleotide reductase). For ribonucleotide reductase, we identified cyclic peptide inhibitors from genetically encoded libraries that dissociated the enzyme subunits. A solid-phase synthetic strategy and peptide ELISAs were developed to characterize these inhibitors, resulting in the discovery of cyclic peptides that operate in an unprecedented manner, thus highlighting the strengths of a functional approach. The ability of this method to process large libraries, coupled with the benefits of a genetic selection, allowed us to identify rare, uniquely active small-molecule modulators of protein–protein interactions at a frequency of less than one in 10 million.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0406999101

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horswill, A. R., Savinov, S. N., & Benkovic, S. J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-10-21
Volume
101
Issue
44
Pages
15591-15596
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2039063799
Cited by
110
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Purdue University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Iowa State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM24129, R01GM024129, R37GM024129)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, small molecule modulators, host cell survival, HIV-1 protease, ribonucleotide reductase, cyclic peptide inhibitors, solid-phase synthesis, peptide ELISA, genetic selection
MeSH terms
Carrier Proteins, Enzyme Inhibitors, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Peptides, Cyclic, Protein Binding, Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Ribonucleotide Reductases, HIV Protease, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), Peptide Library, Sirolimus, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Tacrolimus Binding Protein 1A, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review