Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Substantial DNA damage from submicromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide detected in Hpx - mutants of Escherichia coli

Open access
Park, Sunny, You, Xiaojun, Imlay, James A.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Since the discovery of catalase, it has been postulated that aerobic organisms generate enough oxidants to threaten their own fitness and, in particular, their genetic stability. An alternative is that these enzymes exist to defend the cell against more-abundant oxidants imposed by external sources. These hypotheses were tested directly through study of Hpx - ( katG katE ahpCF ) mutants of Escherichia coli , which lack enzymes to scavenge hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ). These strains grew well in anaerobic medium but poorly when they were aerated. The Hpx - bacteria formed filaments and exhibited high rates of mutagenesis, both indicators of DNA damage. An additional recA mutation caused Hpx - cells to die rapidly upon aeration, even though the intracellular H 2 O 2 was <1 μM. Spin-trap experiments detected substantial hydroxyl radicals, and cell-permeable iron chelators eliminated both the phenotypic defects and hydroxyl-radical formation, confirming that the Fenton reaction was responsible. An Hpx - oxyR strain exhibited even more DNA lesions than did the Hpx - mutant, indicating that the OxyR stress response induced protein(s) that suppressed DNA damage. One critical protein was Dps, an iron-sequestration protein, because Hpx - dps mutants exhibited sensitivity similar to that of the Hpx - oxyR mutant. These results reveal that aerobic E. coli generates sufficient H 2 O 2 to create toxic levels of DNA damage. Scavenging enzymes and controls on free iron are required to avoid that fate. The rate constant of the Fenton reaction measured at physiological pH was much higher than under the acidic conditions that were used to determine the commonly cited value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0502051102

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Park, S., You, X., & Imlay, J. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-06-20
Volume
102
Issue
26
Pages
9317-9322
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2030295309
Cited by
342
References
50
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substantial DNA damage from submicromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide detected in Hpx - mutants of Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0502051102
The paper
Park, S., You, X., & Imlay, J. A. (2005). Substantial DNA damage from submicromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide detected in Hpx - mutants of Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502051102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.