The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HIV Gag protein conjugated to a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist improves the magnitude and quality of Th1 and CD8+T cell responses in nonhuman primates
Open accessAbstract
Induction and maintenance of antibody and T cell responses will be critical for developing a successful vaccine against HIV. A rational approach for generating such responses is to design vaccines or adjuvants that have the capacity to activate specific antigen-presenting cells. In this regard, dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells for generating primary T cell responses. Here, we report that Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists and ligands that activate DCs in vitro influence the magnitude and quality of the cellular immune response in nonhuman primates (NHPs) when administered with HIV Gag protein. NHPs immunized with HIV Gag protein and a TLR7/8 agonist or a TLR9 ligand [CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN)] had significantly increased Gag-specific T helper 1 and antibody responses, compared with animals immunized with HIV Gag protein alone. Importantly, conjugating the HIV Gag protein to the TLR7/8 agonist (Gag-TLR7/8 conjugate) dramatically enhanced the magnitude and altered the quality of the T helper 1 response, compared with animals immunized with HIV Gag protein and the TLR7/8 agonist or CpG ODN. Furthermore, immunization with the Gag-TLR7/8 conjugate vaccine elicited Gag-specific CD8+T responses. Collectively, our results show that conjugating HIV Gag protein to a TLR7/8 agonist is an effective way to elicit broad-based adaptive immunity in NHPs. This type of vaccine formulation should have utility in preventive or therapeutic vaccines in which humoral and cellular immunity is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takeda, K., Kaisho, T., & Akira, S. (2003) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 · Cited by 6,143
Kadowaki, N., Ho, S., Antonenko, S., de Waal Malefyt, R., Kastelein, R. A., Bazan, F., & Liu, Y.-J. (2001) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.194.6.863 · Cited by 1,964
Development and Homeostasis of T Cell Memory in Rhesus Macaque
Pitcher, C. J., Hagen, S. I., Walker, J. M., Lum, R., Mitchell, B. L., Maino, V. C., Axthelm, M. K., & Picker, L. J. (2002) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.168.1.29 · Cited by 467
Cited by
mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation
Araki, K., Turner, A. P., Shaffer, V. O., Gangappa, S., Keller, S. A., Bachmann, M. F., Larsen, C. P., & Ahmed, R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08155 · Cited by 1,575
Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with Toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists
Kanzler, H., Barrat, F. J., Hessel, E. M., & Coffman, R. L. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1589 · Cited by 869
Accelerating Next-Generation Vaccine Development for Global Disease Prevention
Koff, W. C., Burton, D. R., Johnson, P. R., Walker, B. D., King, C. R., Nabel, G. J., Ahmed, R., Bhan, M. K., & Plotkin, S. A. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232910 · Cited by 282
Cancer Vaccines, Adjuvants, and Delivery Systems
Paston, S. J., Brentville, V. A., Symonds, P., & Durrant, L. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.627932 · Cited by 200
Kwissa, M., Nakaya, H. I., Oluoch, H., & Pulendran, B. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-388579 · Cited by 132
Powers, N., Massena, C., Crouse, B., Smith, M., Hicks, L., Evans, J. T., Miller, S., Pravetoni, M., & Burkhart, D. (2023) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00347 · Cited by 15
Zeng, W., Horrocks, K. J., Tan, A. C. L., Wong, C. Y., Chua, B. Y., & Jackson, D. C. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.055 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wille-Reece, U., Flynn, B. J., Loré, K., Koup, R. A., Kedl, R. M., Mattapallil, J. J., Weiss, W. R., Roederer, M., & Seder, R. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-10-11
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15190-15194
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2002382248
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.