Cited by 156

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The E7 proteins of low- and high-risk human papillomaviruses share the ability to target the pRB family member p130 for degradation

Zhang, Benyue, Chen, Wei, Roman, Ann·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) (e.g., HPV-16) cause anogenital and head and neck cancers, and low-risk HPVs (e.g., HPV-6) cause benign hyperproliferative disease. The E7 protein of HPV-16 binds all retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRB) family members with higher affinity than HPV-6E7. The HPV-16 E7 protein has been reported to target pRB family members for degradation and to immortalize cells. Here we tested the hypothesis that the low-risk E7 protein has an intrinsic ability to decrease expression of pRB family members. First, we introduced a high-affinity pRB-binding site into HPV-6 E7 (6E7G22D) and showed that, in human foreskin keratinocytes, HPV-6 E7G22D decreased the level of pRB protein but not pRB mRNA. Second, we analyzed the ability of wild-type HPV-6 E7 to destabilize the other pRB family members, p107 and p130. HPV-6 E7, like HPV-16 E7, decreased the level of p130 protein. This decrease was inhibited by MG132, a proteasome inhibitor. Binding of HPV-6 E7 to p130 was necessary but not sufficient to decrease the level of p130. Furthermore, the destabilization of p130 correlated with a decrease in the expression of involucrin, a differentiation marker. We suggest that the shared activity of HPV-16 E7 and HPV-6 E7 to destabilize p130 and decrease or delay differentiation may be related to the role of E7 in the HPV life cycle. The added ability of HPV-16 E7 to regulate pRB and p107 may be related to oncogenic activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0510012103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1038/nrc798 · DOI
  2. 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.362-372.2004 · DOI
  3. 10.1101/gad.9.19.2335 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8449 · DOI
  5. 10.1128/JVI.74.14.6622-6631.2000 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/JVI.78.5.2620-2626.2004 · DOI
  7. 10.1128/jvi.64.2.723-730.1990 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1128/jvi.66.4.2418-2427.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4549 · DOI
  10. Boyer, S. N., Wazer, D. E. & Band, V. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 4620-4624.8840974
  11. 10.1128/jvi.71.4.2905-2912.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7583-7591.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1128/JVI.75.15.6737-6747.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4705-4712.2001 · DOI
  15. 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3533-3541.2004 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08594.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1128/jvi.70.10.6862-6869.1996 · DOI
  18. Hu, T. H., Ferril, S. C., Snider, A. M. & Barbosa, M. S. (1995) Int. J. Oncol. 6, 167-174.
  19. 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4382 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4442 · DOI
  21. 10.1099/0022-1317-73-5-1275 · DOI
  22. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1569 · DOI
  23. Nevins, J. R. (1998) Cell Growth Differ. 9, 585-593.9716176
  24. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203244 · DOI
  25. 10.1006/excr.2000.5135 · DOI
  26. 10.1101/gad.1011202 · DOI
  27. 10.1242/dev.00453 · DOI
  28. Woodworth, C. D., Cheng, S., Simpson, S., Hamacher, L., Chow, L. T., Broker, T. R. & DiPaolo, J. A. (1992) Oncogene 7, 619-626.1314365
  29. 10.1101/gad.11.16.2101 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00080-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6922-6930.1991 · DOI
  32. Ikeda, M. A. & Nevins, J. R. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7029-7035.8413292
  33. 10.1093/carcin/24.2.159 · DOI
  34. 10.1101/gad.14.7.804 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1128/MCB.22.2.453-468.2002 · DOI
  36. 10.1101/gad.969202 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2449 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1128/MCB.17.9.4979 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/MCB.17.8.4761 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1074/jbc.M307044200 · DOI
  41. 10.1128/jvi.71.12.9410-9416.1997 · DOI
  42. 10.1006/viro.1998.9220 · DOI
  43. 10.1128/MCB.24.20.8970-8980.2004 · DOI
  44. Ciccolini, F., Di Pasquale, G., Carlotti, F., Crawford, L. & Tommasino, M. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2633-2638.8058327
  45. 10.1128/jvi.68.11.7051-7059.1994 · DOI
  46. 10.1128/jvi.66.4.2125-2134.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1128/JVI.76.1.220-231.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1006/viro.1997.8885 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.009 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, B., Chen, W., & Roman, A.
Affiliations
Department of Microbiology and Immunology and The Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine and The Walther Cancer Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-12-28
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
437-442
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
156
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review