The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global analysis of carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus using cDNA microarrays
Abstract
The transport and catabolic machinery involved in carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus was characterized genetically by using whole-genome cDNA microarrays. Global transcriptional profiles were determined for growth on glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, galactose, trehalose, raffinose, and fructooligosaccharides. Hybridizations were carried out by using a round-robin design, and microarray data were analyzed with a two-stage mixed model ANOVA. Differentially expressed genes were visualized by hierarchical clustering, volcano plots, and contour plots. Overall, only 63 genes (3% of the genome) showed a >4-fold induction. Specifically, transporters of the phospho enol pyruvate:sugar transferase system were identified for uptake of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and trehalose, whereas ATP-binding cassette transporters were identified for uptake of raffinose and fructooligosaccharides. A member of the LacS subfamily of galactoside-pentose hexuronide translocators was identified for uptake of galactose and lactose. Saccharolytic enzymes likely involved in the metabolism of monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides into substrates of glycolysis were also found, including enzymatic machinery of the Leloir pathway. The transcriptome appeared to be regulated by carbon catabolite repression. Although substrate-specific carbohydrate transporters and hydrolases were regulated at the transcriptional level, genes encoding regulatory proteins CcpA, Hpr, HprK/P, and EI were consistently highly expressed. Genes central to glycolysis were among the most highly expressed in the genome. Collectively, microarray data revealed that coordinated and regulated transcription of genes involved in sugar uptake and metabolism is based on the specific carbohydrate provided. L. acidophilus 's adaptability to environmental conditions likely contributes to its competitive ability for limited carbohydrate sources available in the human gastrointestinal tract.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00017-08 · Cited by 1,013
How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria
de Melo Pereira, G. V., de Oliveira Coelho, B., Magalhães Júnior, A. I., Thomaz-Soccol, V., & Soccol, C. R. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003 · Cited by 523
Kohl, K. D., Amaya, J., Passement, C. A., Dearing, M. D., & McCue, M. D. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12442 · Cited by 249
The genomics of lactic acid bacteria
Pfeiler, E. A., & Klaenhammer, T. R. (2007) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.010 · Cited by 192
Self-citationSriramulu, D. D., Liang, M., Hernandez-Romero, D., Raux-Deery, E., Lünsdorf, H., Parsons, J. B., Warren, M. J., & Prentice, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01535-07 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrangou, R., Azcarate-Peril, M. A., Duong, T., Conners, S. B., Kelly, R. M., & Klaenhammer, T. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-02-27
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3816-3821
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2058277418
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global analysis of carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus using cDNA microarrays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0511287103
- The paper
- Barrangou, R., Azcarate-Peril, M. A., Duong, T., Conners, S. B., Kelly, R. M., & Klaenhammer, T. R. (2006). Global analysis of carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus using cDNA microarrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511287103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.