The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 256 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria
Abstract
International competition within the dairy market and increasing public awareness about the importance of functional food consumption are providing new challenges for innovation in the probiotic sector. In this context, countless references are currently dedicated to the selection and characterization of new species and more specific strains of probiotic bacteria. In general, these studies adopt basic selection criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO), including host-associated stress resistance, epithelium adhesion ability, and antimicrobial activity. These aspects are applied to ensure that the candidate probiotic could withstand the stressful conditions of the human digestive system and exert functional proprieties. However, it cannot be assumed that these novel microbial strains are capable of offering several biological benefits attributed to probiotics. Additionally, safety-associated selection criteria, such as plasmid-associated antibiotic resistance spreading and enterotoxin production, are often neglected. This article reviews the recent developments in the processes, strategies, and methods, such as anticarcinogenic, antidepression, antianxiety, antiobesity, antidiabetic, immunostimulatory, and cholesterol-lowering assessments, to select probiotic strains with the ultimate objective of assisting future probiotic microbe evaluation studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress
Schieber, M., & Chandel, N. S. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034 · Cited by 6,931
Gut–brain axis: How the microbiome influences anxiety and depression
Foster, J. A., & McVey Neufeld, K.-A. (2013) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.005 · Cited by 2,460
The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier
Marchesi, J. R., Adams, D. H., Fava, F., Hermes, G. D. A., Hirschfield, G. M., Hold, G., Quraishi, M. N., Kinross, J., Smidt, H., Tuohy, K. M., et al. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990 · Cited by 2,302
Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry
Leroy, F., & De Vuyst, L. (2004) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004 · Cited by 1,852
Selection of Resistant Bacteria at Very Low Antibiotic Concentrations
Gullberg, E., Cao, S., Berg, O. G., Ilbäck, C., Sandegren, L., Hughes, D., & Andersson, D. I. (2011) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002158 · Cited by 1,654
The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain
Collins, S. M., Surette, M., & Bercik, P. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2876 · Cited by 1,611
Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health
Parvez, S., Malik, K. A., Ah Kang, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (2006) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x · Cited by 1,435
Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity
Tillisch, K., Labus, J., Kilpatrick, L., Jiang, Z., Stains, J., Ebrat, B., Guyonnet, D., Legrain–Raspaud, S., Trotin, B., Naliboff, B., et al. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.043 · Cited by 1,192
Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes
Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Tashiro, Y., & Sonomoto, K. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.002 · Cited by 1,022
Cited by
Terpou, A., Papadaki, A., Lappa, I., Kachrimanidou, V., Bosnea, L., & Kopsahelis, N. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11071591 · Cited by 779
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez‐Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover‐Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., et al. (2021) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6377 · Cited by 445
The food-gut axis: lactic acid bacteria and their link to food, the gut microbiome and human health
De Filippis, F., Pasolli, E., & Ercolini, D. (2020) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaa015 · Cited by 303
A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications
Sarita, B., Samadhan, D., Hassan, M. Z., & Kovaleva, E. G. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1487641 · Cited by 250
Treatment strategies against diabetes: Success so far and challenges ahead.
Khursheed, R., Singh, S. K., Wadhwa, S., Kapoor, B., Gulati, M., Kumar, R., Ramanunny, A. K., Awasthi, A., & Dua, K. (2019) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172625 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- de Melo Pereira, G. V., de Oliveira Coelho, B., Magalhães Júnior, A. I., Thomaz-Soccol, V., & Soccol, C. R.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2060-2076
- ISSN
- 0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892926776
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 256
- FWCI
- 31.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003
- The paper
- de Melo Pereira, G. V., de Oliveira Coelho, B., Magalhães Júnior, A. I., Thomaz-Soccol, V., & Soccol, C. R. (2018). How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria. Biotechnology Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
