The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells
Open accessAbstract
To better direct repair following spinal cord injury (SCI), we designed an implant modeled after the intact spinal cord consisting of a multicomponent polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. Implantation of the scaffold–neural stem cells unit into an adult rat hemisection model of SCI promoted long-term improvement in function (persistent for 1 year in some animals) relative to a lesion-control group. At 70 days postinjury, animals implanted with scaffold-plus-cells exhibited coordinated, weight-bearing hindlimb stepping. Histology and immunocytochemical analysis suggested that this recovery might be attributable partly to a reduction in tissue loss from secondary injury processes as well as in diminished glial scarring. Tract tracing demonstrated corticospinal tract fibers passing through the injury epicenter to the caudal cord, a phenomenon not present in untreated groups. Together with evidence of enhanced local GAP-43 expression not seen in controls, these findings suggest a possible regeneration component. These results may suggest a new approach to SCI and, more broadly, may serve as a prototype for multidisciplinary strategies against complex neurological problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Overcoming the challenges in administering biopharmaceuticals: Formulation and delivery strategies
Mitragotri, S., Burke, P. A., & Langer, R. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4363 · Cited by 1,702
Self-citationPolylactic acid (PLA) controlled delivery carriers for biomedical applications
Tyler, B., Gullotti, D., Mangraviti, A., Utsuki, T., & Brem, H. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.018 · Cited by 1,050
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047
A decade of progress in tissue engineering
Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.123 · Cited by 747
Self-citationNanotechnology—novel therapeutics for CNS disorders
Srikanth, M., & Kessler, J. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.76 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Teng, Y. D., Lavik, E. B., Qu, X., Park, K. I., Ourednik, J., Zurakowski, D., Langer, R., & Snyder, E. Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-02-26
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3024-3029
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2123450039
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.052678899
- The paper
- Teng, Y. D., Lavik, E. B., Qu, X., Park, K. I., Ourednik, J., Zurakowski, D., Langer, R., & Snyder, E. Y. (2002). Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052678899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.