The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes
Open accessAbstract
Olfactory receptor (OR) genes constitute the basis for the sense of smell and are encoded by the largest mammalian gene superfamily of >1,000 genes. In humans, >60% of these are pseudogenes. In contrast, the mouse OR repertoire, although of roughly equal size, contains only ≈20% pseudogenes. We asked whether the high fraction of nonfunctional OR genes is specific to humans or is a common feature of all primates. To this end, we have compared the sequences of 50 human OR coding regions, regardless of their functional annotations, to those of their putative orthologs in chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, and rhesus macaques. We found that humans have accumulated mutations that disrupt OR coding regions roughly 4-fold faster than any other species sampled. As a consequence, the fraction of OR pseudogenes in humans is almost twice as high as in the non-human primates, suggesting a human-specific process of OR gene disruption, likely due to a reduced chemosensory dependence relative to apes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
Cited by
Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios
Clark, A. G., Glanowski, S., Nielsen, R., Thomas, P. D., Kejariwal, A., Todd, M. A., Tanenbaum, D. M., Civello, D., Lu, F., Murphy, B., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088821 · Cited by 668
Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth
McGann, J. P. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7263 · Cited by 500
The genomic rate of adaptive evolution
EYREWALKER, A. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.015 · Cited by 316
Pseudogenization of a Sweet-Receptor Gene Accounts for Cats' Indifference toward Sugar
Li, X., Li, W., Wang, H., Cao, J., Maehashi, K., Huang, L., Bachmanov, A. A., Reed, D. R., Legrand-Defretin, V., Beauchamp, G. K., et al. (2005) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010003 · Cited by 264
Olfactory Receptor Multigene Family in Vertebrates: From the Viewpoint of Evolutionary Genomics
Niimura, Y. (2012) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/138920212799860706 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilad, Y., Man, O., Pääbo, S., & Lancet, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-02-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3324-3327
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2056179629
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0535697100
- The paper
- Gilad, Y., Man, O., Pääbo, S., & Lancet, D. (2003). Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0535697100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.