The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudogenization of a Sweet-Receptor Gene Accounts for Cats' Indifference toward Sugar
Open accessAbstract
Although domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) possess an otherwise functional sense of taste, they, unlike most mammals, do not prefer and may be unable to detect the sweetness of sugars. One possible explanation for this behavior is that cats lack the sensory system to taste sugars and therefore are indifferent to them. Drawing on work in mice, demonstrating that alleles of sweet-receptor genes predict low sugar intake, we examined the possibility that genes involved in the initial transduction of sweet perception might account for the indifference to sweet-tasting foods by cats. We characterized the sweet-receptor genes of domestic cats as well as those of other members of the Felidae family of obligate carnivores, tiger and cheetah. Because the mammalian sweet-taste receptor is formed by the dimerization of two proteins (T1R2 and T1R3; gene symbols Tas1r2 and Tas1r3), we identified and sequenced both genes in the cat by screening a feline genomic BAC library and by performing PCR with degenerate primers on cat genomic DNA. Gene expression was assessed by RT-PCR of taste tissue, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The cat Tas1r3 gene shows high sequence similarity with functional Tas1r3 genes of other species. Message from Tas1r3 was detected by RT-PCR of taste tissue. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical studies demonstrate that Tas1r3 is expressed, as expected, in taste buds. However, the cat Tas1r2 gene shows a 247-base pair microdeletion in exon 3 and stop codons in exons 4 and 6. There was no evidence of detectable mRNA from cat Tas1r2 by RT-PCR or in situ hybridization, and no evidence of protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Tas1r2 in tiger and cheetah and in six healthy adult domestic cats all show the similar deletion and stop codons. We conclude that cat Tas1r3 is an apparently functional and expressed receptor but that cat Tas1r2 is an unexpressed pseudogene. A functional sweet-taste receptor heteromer cannot form, and thus the cat lacks the receptor likely necessary for detection of sweet stimuli. This molecular change was very likely an important event in the evolution of the cat's carnivorous behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mammalian sweet taste receptors
Nelson, G., Hoon, M. A., Chandrashekar, J., Zhang, Y., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00451-2 · Cited by 1,702
Nelson, G., Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M. A., Feng, L., Zhao, G., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature726 · Cited by 1,518
Human receptors for sweet and umami taste
Li, X., Staszewski, L., Xu, H., Durick, K., Zoller, M., & Adler, E. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.072090199 · Cited by 1,378
Self-citationSchaeren-Wiemers, N., & Gerfin-Moser, A. (1993) · Histochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00267823 · Cited by 1,157
Kim, U.-K., Jorgenson, E., Coon, H., Leppert, M., Risch, N., & Drayna, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080190 · Cited by 904
Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors
Pin, J.-P., Galvez, T., & Prézeau, L. (2003) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(03)00038-x · Cited by 662
Tas1r3, encoding a new candidate taste receptor, is allelic to the sweet responsiveness locus Sac
Max, M., Shanker, Y. G., Huang, L., Rong, M., Liu, Z., Campagne, F., Weinstein, H., Damak, S., & Margolskee, R. F. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0501-58 · Cited by 526
Self-citationGilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D., & Pääbo, S. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020005 · Cited by 475
A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus
Montmayeur, J.-P., Liberles, S. D., Matsunami, H., & Buck, L. B. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87440 · Cited by 471
Molecular Genetic Identification of a Candidate Receptor Gene for Sweet Taste
Kitagawa, M., Kusakabe, Y., Miura, H., Ninomiya, Y., & Hino, A. (2001) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4760 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects
Yarmolinsky, D. A., Zuker, C. S., & Ryba, N. J. P. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.001 · Cited by 856
An Evolutionary Perspective on Food and Human Taste
Breslin, P. A. S. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.010 · Cited by 508
Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome
Pontius, J. U., Mullikin, J. C., Smith, D. R., Agencourt Sequencing Team, Lindblad-Toh, K., Gnerre, S., Clamp, M., Chang, J., Stephens, R., Neelam, B., et al. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6380007 · Cited by 368
Taste receptors of the gut: emerging roles in health and disease
Depoortere, I. (2014) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305112 · Cited by 315
Plantinga, E. A., Bosch, G., & Hendriks, W. H. (2011) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114511002285 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Li, W., Wang, H., Cao, J., Maehashi, K., Huang, L., Bachmanov, A. A., Reed, D. R., Legrand-Defretin, V., Beauchamp, G. K., & Brand, J. G.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2005-07-25
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e3
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2108366874
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudogenization of a Sweet-Receptor Gene Accounts for Cats' Indifference toward Sugar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010003
- The paper
- Li, X., Li, W., Wang, H., Cao, J., Maehashi, K., Huang, L., Bachmanov, A. A., Reed, D. R., Legrand-Defretin, V., Beauchamp, G. K., & Brand, J. G. (2005). Pseudogenization of a Sweet-Receptor Gene Accounts for Cats' Indifference toward Sugar. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.