Cited by 401Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A genetic variant that disrupts MET transcription is associated with autism

Open access

Abstract

There is strong evidence for a genetic predisposition to autism and an intense interest in discovering heritable risk factors that disrupt gene function. Based on neurobiological findings and location within a chromosome 7q31 autism candidate gene region, we analyzed the gene encoding the pleiotropic MET receptor tyrosine kinase in a family based study of autism including 1,231 cases. MET signaling participates in neocortical and cerebellar growth and maturation, immune function, and gastrointestinal repair, consistent with reported medical complications in some children with autism. Here, we show genetic association ( P = 0.0005) of a common C allele in the promoter region of the MET gene in 204 autism families. The allelic association at this MET variant was confirmed in a replication sample of 539 autism families ( P = 0.001) and in the combined sample ( P = 0.000005). Multiplex families, in which more than one child has autism, exhibited the strongest allelic association ( P = 0.000007). In case-control analyses, the autism diagnosis relative risk was 2.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.41–3.65; P = 0.0006) for the CC genotype and 1.67 (95% confidence interval: 1.11–2.49; P = 0.012) for the CG genotype compared with the GG genotype. Functional assays showed that the C allele results in a 2-fold decrease in MET promoter activity and altered binding of specific transcription factor complexes. These data implicate reduced MET gene expression in autism susceptibility, providing evidence of a previously undescribed pathophysiological basis for this behaviorally and medically complex disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0605296103

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. PC Ma, T Kijima, G Maulik, EA Fox, M Sattler, JD Griffin, BE Johnson, R Salgia Cancer Res 63, 6272–6281 (2003).
  2. N Grabe In Silico Biol 2, S1–S15 (2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, D. B., Sutcliffe, J. S., Ebert, P. J., Militerni, R., Bravaccio, C., Trillo, S., Elia, M., Schneider, C., Melmed, R., Sacco, R., Persico, A. M., & Levitt, P.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Associazione Anni Verdi ONLUS, 00148 Rome, Italy;
  • Oasi Maria SS (IT)
  • **Center for Autism Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ 85012;
  • Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center (US)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-11-07
Volume
103
Issue
45
Pages
16834-16839
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2131073955
Cited by
401
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 36
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061009, MH65299, MH 61009, MH 64547, R01MH064547, T32MH065215)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD015052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, MET receptor tyrosine kinase, promoter polymorphism, genetic association, autism susceptibility, transcriptional regulation, multiplex families, chromosome 7q31, transcription factor binding, gene expression
MeSH terms
Alleles, Autistic Disorder, Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7, DNA, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Case-Control Studies, Receptors, Growth Factor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review