Cited by 52Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic diversity and population structure

Implications of multilocus inheritance for gene-disease association studies

Risch, Neil·2001·Theoretical Population Biology

Abstract

The impact of multilocus inheritance on the power of candidate gene association studies and the parameters derived therefrom is considered. Both case-control and family-based control designs are included. When the background heritability H (i.e., residual correlation) among sibs for the disease in question is high, the power of multiplex affected sibships versus singletons is diminished compared with the situation when background heritability is low. Thus, multiplex families for association studies are most advantageous for low heritability disorders. Estimates of genotype relative risk (GRR) are also distorted in multiplex sibships compared with singletons based on background heritability. In a case-control study, GRR is inflated in multiplex families, with the degree of inflation decreasing with background heritability. By contrast, in a TDT (parental control) study, GRR is deflated in multiplex families, with the degree of deflation increasing with background heritability (and no deflation when H is 0). Considering identical twins, the difference in genotype frequencies between concordant versus discordant MZ twin pairs for the candidate gene is large when the heritability is low, but modest when the heritability is high.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1538

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An excess of multiplex families relative to population frequencies could substantially diminish the estimated Vm.

    “Various factors could skew this distribution and thus bias downwards the estimated Vm, a notable one being an excess of multiplex families relative to population frequencies (35,36).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Risch, N.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Risch, Neil
Venue
Theoretical Population Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
215-220
ISSN
0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006356781
Cited by
52
References
16
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theoretical Population Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
gene-disease association, candidate gene association, statistical power, genotype relative risk, case-control study, transmission disequilibrium test, monozygotic twin concordance
MeSH terms
Alleles, Chromosome Mapping, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Models, Genetic, Pedigree, Risk, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review