The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication.
Open accessAbstract
Among yeasts that underwent whole-genome duplication (WGD), Kluyveromyces polysporus represents the lineage most distant from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By sequencing the K. polysporus genome and comparing it with the S. cerevisiae genome using a likelihood model of gene loss, we show that these species diverged very soon after the WGD, when their common ancestor contained >9,000 genes. The two genomes subsequently converged onto similar current sizes (5,600 protein-coding genes each) and independently retained sets of duplicated genes that are strikingly similar. Almost half of their surviving single-copy genes are not orthologs but paralogs formed by WGD, as would be expected if most gene pairs were resolved independently. In addition, by comparing the pattern of gene loss among K. polysporus, S. cerevisiae, and three other yeasts that diverged after the WGD, we show that the patterns of gene loss changed over time. Initially, both members of a duplicate pair were equally likely to be lost, but loss of the same gene copy in independent lineages was increasingly favored at later time points. This trend parallels an increasing restriction of reciprocal gene loss to more slowly evolving gene pairs over time and suggests that, as duplicate genes diverged, one gene copy became favored over the other. The apparent low initial sequence divergence of the gene pairs leads us to propose that the yeast WGD was probably an autopolyploidization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These Ty-like retrotransposons genes (named here Tkp5-1 to -9) were most similar to the Tkp5 protein from V. polyspora, a yeast representing the postwhole-genome duplication lineage most divergent from S. cerevisiae (Scannell et al. 2007).”
From Comparative Genomics of Two Sequential Candida glabrata Clinical Isolates (2017) · cites this paper as Scannell et al. 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy AssessmentPreprint
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,993
Goffeau, A., Barrell, B. G., Bussey, H., Davis, R. W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H., Galibert, F., Hoheisel, J. D., Jacq, C., Johnston, M., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.546 · Cited by 4,423
Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome
Wolfe, K. H., & Shields, D. C. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42711 · Cited by 1,785
Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements
Kellis, M., Patterson, N. J., Endrizzi, M. G., Birren, B. W., & Lander, E. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01644 · Cited by 1,751
Dujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer, G., Durrens, P., Casaregola, S., Lafontaine, I., de Montigny, J., Marck, C., Neuvéglise, C., Talla, E., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02579 · Cited by 1,623
Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Kellis, M., Birren, B. W., & Lander, E. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02424 · Cited by 1,500
Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J., & Chapman, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307901101 · Cited by 1,090
The Genomes of Oryza sativa: A History of Duplications
Yu, J. M., Wang, J., Lin, W., Li, H., Li, H., Zhou, J., Ni, P., Dong, W., Hu, S., Zeng, C., et al. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030038 · Cited by 989
Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes
Maere, S., Bodt, S. D., Raes, J., Casneuf, T., MONTAGU, M. V., Kuiper, M. T. R., & de Peer, Y. V. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0501102102 · Cited by 933
Finding Functional Features in Saccharomyces Genomes by Phylogenetic Footprinting
Cliften, P. F., Sudarsanam, P., Desikan, A., Fulton, L. A., Fulton, B., Majors, J. E., Waterston, R., Cohen, B. A., & Johnston, M. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1084337 · Cited by 813
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- CJ Roberts, JP van der Walt Compt Rend Lab Carlsberg 31, 129–148 (1959).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2482 · Cited by 1,281
“We have previously suggested that, because duplicate gene loss after WGD is commo”
BackgroundSelf-citationAlbalat, R., & Cañestro, C. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · Cited by 775
Unraveling ancient hexaploidy through multiply-aligned angiosperm gene mapsPreprint
Tang, H., Wang, X., Bowers, J., Ming, R., Alam, M. S., & Paterson, A. H. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.080978.108 · Cited by 657
“In contrast to “duplication-resistant” genes, many “deletion-resistant” loci of known function are transcription factors, consistent with previous findings that transcriptional regulators are significantly over-retained in WGD duplicates (Seoighe and Gehring 2004; Freeling and Thomas 2006).”
ResultDrinnenberg, I. A., Weinberg, D. E., Xie, K. T., Mower, J. P., Wolfe, K. H., Fink, G. R., & Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176945 · Cited by 524
Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch
Hittinger, C. T., & Carroll, S. B. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06151 · Cited by 439
Stajich, J., Wilke, S. K., Ahrén, D., Au, C. H., Birren, B. W., Borodovsky, M. Y., Burns, C., Canbäck, B., Casselton, L. A., Cheng, C. K., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003391107 · Cited by 424
“Sequencing and analysis of chromosome assemblies from ascomycete fungi have revealed blocks of shared ancestral gene order (1, 2), the consequences and sorting of gene pairs after whole-genome duplication (3), and the preferential location of large gene families near chromosome ends (4, 5).”
BackgroundConsequences of genome duplication
Sémon, M., & Wolfe, K. H. (2007) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2007.09.007 · Cited by 437
Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes
Edger, P. P., & Pires, J. C. (2009) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-009-9055-9 · Cited by 399
“polyploids exhibit greater biomass, fertility, and speed of development, thus are more vigorous and tend to outcompete diploid competitors), the neutral loss of alternate membersofdosage-insensitivegeneduplicates in different species, also known as reciprocal gene loss, has been well established to drive reproductive…”
BackgroundBarker, M. S., Kane, N. C., Matvienko, M., Kozik, A., Michelmore, R. W., Knapp, S. J., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn187 · Cited by 345
Marcet‐Houben, M., & Gabaldón, T. (2015) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002220 · Cited by 334
“cerevisiae lineage, originating a clade of post-WGD species (Fig 1A) [10].”
BackgroundMethodDujon, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2811 · Cited by 330
Conant, G. C., Birchler, J. A., & Pires, J. C. (2014) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.008 · Cited by 303
Scannell, D. R., Zill, O. A., Rokas, A., Payen, C., Dunham, M. J., Eisen, M. B., Rine, J., Johnston, M., & Hittinger, C. T. (2011) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.111.000273 · Cited by 306
“Although low-to-medium-coverage genome sequences of many species in this group have been determined (Scannell et al. 2007a), relatively few are complete and well-annotated (Dujon 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe quest for orthologs: finding the corresponding gene across genomes
Kuzniar, A., van Ham, R. C. H. J., Pongor, S., & Leunissen, J. A. M. (2008) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.009 · Cited by 313
Gordon, J., Byrne, K. P., & Wolfe, K. H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000485 · Cited by 251
“redundant copies of duplicated genes) [11].”
BackgroundCompatibility with Killer Explains the Rise of RNAi-Deficient Fungi
Drinnenberg, I. A., Fink, G. R., & Bartel, D. P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1209575 · Cited by 233
Comparative genomics of protoploid SaccharomycetaceaePreprint
Souciet, J.-L., Dujon, B., GAILLARDIN, C., Johnston, M., Baret, P. V., Cliften, P., Sherman, D. J., Weissenbach, J., Westhof, É., Wincker, P., et al. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.091546.109 · Cited by 219
“Given the tree topology of Kurtzman (2003) and the fact that the Vanderwaltozyma clade was recently demonstrated to have emerged after the duplication (Scannell et al. 2007b), Zygosaccharomyces represents the last clade having diverged from its relatives prior to the”
BackgroundGoût, J.-F., Kahn, D., & Duret, L. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000944 · Cited by 213
“However progressive changes in gene dosage do occur: most ohnologs are lost, while only a subset is retained over long evolutionary times [9,10].”
BackgroundFungal Secretome Database: Integrated platform for annotation of fungal secretomes
Choi, J., Park, J., Kim, D., Jung, K., Kang, S., & Lee, Y. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-105 · Cited by 196
“7 5,367 219 276 58 553 [76]”
Evolutionary Role of Interspecies Hybridization and Genetic Exchanges in Yeasts
Morales, L., & Dujon, B. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00022-12 · Cited by 190
“The first evidence of this phenomenon was discovered accidentally in the genome of Vanderwaltozyma polyspora (187).”
BackgroundFungal cytochrome P450 database
Park, J., Lee, S., Choi, J., Ahn, K., Park, B. S., Park, J., Kang, S., & Lee, Y. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-402 · Cited by 172
Genome Characterization of the Oleaginous Fungus Mortierella alpina
Wang, L., Chen, W., Feng, Y., Ren, Y., Gu, Z., Chen, H., Wang, H., Thomas, M. J., Zhang, B., Berquin, I. M., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028319 · Cited by 174
“neoformans B-3501A [71], Gibberella zeae PH-1 (Fusarium graminearum) [72], Laccaria bicolor S238N-H82 [73], Malassezia globosa CBS 7966 [74], Magnaporthe grisea 70-15 [75], Neurospora crassa OR74A [76], Podospora anserina S mat+ [77], Scheffersomyces stipitis CBS 6054 (pichia stipitis CBS 6054) [78], Saccharomyces cer…”
BackgroundVanneste, K., Maere, S., & de Peer, Y. V. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0353 · Cited by 174
Koenen, E. J. M., Ojeda, D. I., Steeves, R., Migliore, J., Bakker, F. T., Wieringa, J. J., Kidner, C., Hardy, O. J., Pennington, R. T., Herendeen, P. S., et al. (2020) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa041 · Cited by 165
Origin of the Yeast Whole-Genome Duplication
Wolfe, K. H. (2015) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002221 · Cited by 151
“We also know that the WGD is not confined to Saccharomyces but occurred in the common ancestor of six genera, some of which diverged from each at an early stage when more than 4,000 genes were still duplicated, leading to later losses of different gene copies in different lineages [10].”
BackgroundMaintenance and Loss of Duplicated Genes by Dosage Subfunctionalization
Goût, J.-F., & Lynch, M. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv095 · Cited by 143
“Consistent with the more advanced level of ohnolog loss from the yeast WGD (Wolfe and Shields 1997; Aury et al. 2006; Scannell et al. 2007; McGrath, Gout, Johri, et al. 2014), we found that, although yeast ohnologs show significant conservation of expression level (r = 0.38, P< 0.001), the…”
InfluentialMechanisms of Chromosome Number Evolution in Yeast
Gordon, J., Byrne, K. P., & Wolfe, K. H. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002190 · Cited by 140
“polyspora is incomplete [32], there is complete intergenic sequence spanning both of the lost centromeres meaning we are confident of their absence.”
BackgroundEvolutionary erosion of yeast sex chromosomes by mating-type switching accidents
Gordon, J., Armisén, D., Proux‐Wéra, E., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Byrne, K. P., & Wolfe, K. H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112808108 · Cited by 142
“HMR is often on a different chromosome (30), and some species have two HMR loci (31).”
BackgroundBekaert, M., Edger, P. P., Pires, J. C., & Conant, G. C. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.081281 · Cited by 142
“While the loss of duplicated genes after polyploidy may be rapid (Scannell et al., 2007), it is also distinctly nonrandom.”
BackgroundPanwar, V., McCALLUM, B. D., & Bakkeren, G. (2012) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12047 · Cited by 138
“RNAi mechanisms seem to be present in most fungi studied, although some ascomycetes such as Saccharo- myces cerevisiae (Scannell et al., 2007) and some Candida species (Nakayashiki et al., 2006), as well as basidiomy- cete fungi such as the corn smut Ustilago maydis (Laurie et al., 2008), and some…”
BackgroundMcGrath, C., Goût, J.-F., Johri, P., Doak, T. G., & Lynch, M. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.173740.114 · Cited by 138
“The WGD in the yeast lineage is one of the best studied; however, only ;8%–14% of duplicates remain from this event (Wolfe and Shields 1997; Scannell et al. 2007), leaving relatively few genes upon which to draw inferences.”
BackgroundScannell, D. R., & Wolfe, K. H. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6341207 · Cited by 129
“Although this is nominally consistent with our previous conclusion that K. polysporus and S. cerevisiae diverged very soon after the WGD (Scannell et al. 2007a), additional data (not shown) indicate that two sources of error may be contributing to underestimation of the length of the branch between…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGenome Diversity and Evolution in the Budding Yeasts (Saccharomycotina)
Dujon, B., & Louis, E. J. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.199216 · Cited by 136
“Since then there has been a more complete, high quality assembly of these genomes (Scannell et al. 2011).”
BackgroundCai, L., Xi, Z., Amorim, A. M., Sugumaran, M., Rest, J. S., Liu, L., & Davis, C. “. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15357 · Cited by 129
TreSpEx-detection of misleading signal in phylogenetic reconstructions based on tree information
Struck, T. H. (2014) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.4137/ebo.s14239 · Cited by 128
Pigmentation Pathway Evolution after Whole-Genome Duplication in Fish
Braasch, I., Brunet, F., Volff, J., & Schartl, M. (2009) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evp050 · Cited by 129
“Recent studies on WGDs in eukaryotes as divergent as yeasts (Scannell et al. 2007; Wapinski et al. 2007), ciliates (Aury et al. 2006), plants (Maere et al. 2005), early vertebrates (Putnam et al. 2008), teleosts (Brunet et al. 2006), and the frog Xenopus leavis (Semon and Wolfe 2008) revealed that…”
BackgroundGenomics and the making of yeast biodiversity
Hittinger, C. T., Rokas, A., Bai, F., Boekhout, T., Gonçalves, P. M., Jeffries, T. W., Kominek, J., Lachance, M., Libkind, D., Rosa, C. A., et al. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.10.008 · Cited by 135
“Metschnikowia fructicola 277 [1] [62] [77] [77] [78] [79] [77] [37] [37] [8] [37] [37] [37] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [80] [23] [81] [82] [81] [83] [81] [5] [84] [6] [85] [86] [26] GB1 [26] [87] [8] [88] GB2 JGI [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] JGI [94] [95] JGI [40] GB3 [96] GB4 [97] JGI JGI JGI JGI [35] [34] [11] JGI [8…”
Gene-Tree Reconciliation with MUL-Trees to Resolve Polyploidy Events
Thomas, G. W. C., Ather, S. H., & Hahn, M. W. (2017) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syx044 · Cited by 120
Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures
Wang, X., Morton, J. A., Pellicer, J., Leitch, I. J., & Leitch, A. R. (2021) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15363 · Cited by 125
“…on retention patterns of gene duplicates in yeast lineages that gene loss is at first random, impacting orthologs and paralogs equally, but later, amongst the more slowly diverging genes, the losses are no longer random and instead are frequently targeted at specific copies (Scannell et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAn Evolutionary Perspective on Yeast Mating-Type Switching
Hanson, S. J., & Wolfe, K. H. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.117.202036 · Cited by 130
Genomic factors shape carbon and nitrogen metabolic niche breadth across Saccharomycotina yeasts
Opulente, D. A., LaBella, A. L., Harrison, M.-C., Wolters, J. F., Liu, C., Li, Y., Kominek, J., Steenwyk, J. L., Stoneman, H. R., VanDenAvond, J., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adj4503 · Cited by 121
Illeghems, K., Vuyst, L. D., Papalexandratou, Z., & Weckx, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038040 · Cited by 120
“For instance, Vanderwaltozyma polyspora is a yeast species previously isolated from a soil ecosystem [65] and Z.”
BackgroundDetecting and Locating Whole Genome Duplications on a Phylogeny: A Probabilistic Approach
Rabier, C., Ta, T., & Ané, C. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst263 · Cited by 113
Zhang, Y., Zeng, C., & Li, D.-Z. (2012) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.023 · Cited by 113
A pipeline for automated annotation of yeast genome sequences by a conserved-synteny approach
Proux‐Wéra, E., Armisén, D., Byrne, K. P., & Wolfe, K. H. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-237 · Cited by 111
“bayanus [9,35], Naumovozyma castellii (formerly called Saccharomyces castellii) [35,36], Vanderwaltozyma polyspora (formerly called Kluyveromyces polysporus) [37], Candida glabrata [38], Zygosaccharomyces rouxii [16], Kluyveromyces lactis [38], Eremothecium gossypii (previously called Ashbya gossypii) [24], Lachancea…”
BackgroundMultiple pathways inhibit NHEJ at telomeresPreprint
Marcand, S., Pardo, B., Gratias, A., Cahun, S., & Callebaut, I. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.455108 · Cited by 108
“cerevisiae lineage (Scannell et al. 2007).”
Vakirlis, N., Sarilar, V., Drillon, G., Fleiss, A., Agier, N., Meyniel, J.-P., Blanpain, L. T., Carbone, A., Devillers, H., Dubois, K., et al. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.204420.116 · Cited by 96
“Yeast has exemplified the evolutionary importance of gene duplications and losses since the demonstration of an ancestral WGD in the S. cerevisiae lineage (Wolfe and Shields 1997; Fischer et al. 2001; Dietrich et al. 2004; Kellis et al. 2004; Scannell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundSémon, M., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708705105 · Cited by 98
“This hypothesis is supported by our laboratory’s previous work on WGD in yeast, where we found that slow-evolving genes retained their interchangeability for a longer time period after WGD than fastevolving genes (45, 46).”
ResultDRIMM-Synteny: decomposing genomes into evolutionary conserved segments
Pham, S., & Pevzner, P. A. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq465 · Cited by 101
“The yeast gene orders were extracted from (Kellis et al., 2004) and (Scannell et al., 2007).”
MethodNovel genes exhibit distinct patterns of function acquisition and network integration
Capra, J. A., Pollard, K. S., & Singh, M. (2010) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r127 · Cited by 85
“Recently, several studies have demonstrated the relevance of the scale of a duplication that copies a gene to its functional consequences [28-30].”
BackgroundComplex Nature of the Genome in a Wine Spoilage Yeast, Dekkera bruxellensis
Hellborg, L., & Piškur, J. (2009) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00115-09 · Cited by 86
“This nonrandom deletion of gene copies was also previously observed for other yeasts (31) and Arabidopsis thaliana (38).”
BackgroundZhang, Q., Guan, P., Zhao, L., Ma, M., Xie, L., Li, Y., Zheng, R., Ouyang, W., Wang, S., Li, H., et al. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.020 · Cited by 82
Recent allopolyploid origin of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strain ATCC 42981
Gordon, J., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1598 · Cited by 84
“From observations made in the Saccharomyces lineage, both on evolutionary (Scannell et al., 2007) and laboratory timescales (Antunovics et al.”
BackgroundEmery, M. L., Willis, M. M. S., Hao, Y., Barry, K., Oakgrove, K. S., Peng, Y., Schmutz, J., Lyons, E. H., Pires, J. C., Edger, P. P., et al. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007267 · Cited by 81
“In previous work in yeast [15, 22, 70], we found evidence for “convergent” gene losses that were phylogenetically independent and yet more often from the same subgenome than could be explained by chance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMehta, S., Li, H., Hogan, P. G., & Cunningham, K. W. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01197-08 · Cited by 83
“[pSM012 and pSM015]) and Rcn1(1-172)SalI-3 (for inserts truncated before the”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvolutionary Capture of Viral and Plasmid DNA by Yeast Nuclear Chromosomes
Frank, A. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2009) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00110-09 · Cited by 81
Mitochondrial inheritance in budding yeasts: towards an integrated understanding
Solieri, L. (2010) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.08.001 · Cited by 80
Evolutionary principles of modular gene regulation in yeasts
Thompson, D. A., Roy, S., Chan, M., Styczynsky, M. P., Pfiffner, J., French, C., Socha, A., Thielke, A., Napolitano, S., Muller, P., et al. (2013) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00603 · Cited by 78
“K. polysporus, the most basal post-WGD species (Scannell et al., 2007) has an intermediate phenotype between respiro-fermentative and respiratory (Figure 1A, light blue).”
BackgroundExtensive DNA-binding specificity divergence of a conserved transcription regulator
Baker, C. R., Tuch, B. B., & Johnson, A. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019177108 · Cited by 75
“albicans αsgs were mapped across 38 genome-sequenced yeasts (10, 11, 13, 28, 46, 48).”
BackgroundThe Inside-Out Mechanism of Dicers from Budding Yeasts
Weinberg, D. E., Nakanishi, K., Patel, D. J., & Bartel, D. P. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.021 · Cited by 73
Phylogenomic evolutionary surveys of subtilase superfamily genes in fungi
Li, J., Gu, F., Wu, R., Yang, J., & Zhang, K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep45456 · Cited by 75
Kienle, N., Kloepper, T. H., & Fasshauer, D. (2009) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-19 · Cited by 72
“In fact, it has been proposed that these lineages must have diverged and adapted to different living conditions very soon after the WGD, so that the genes retained in duplicates diverged largely independently [65].”
BackgroundAlternative Splicing and Subfunctionalization Generates Functional Diversity in Fungal Proteomes
Marshall, A. N., Montealegre, M. C., Jiménez-López, C., Lorenz, M. C., & van Hoof, A. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003376 · Cited by 69
“retained different subsets of duplicated genes [9].”
Clade- and species-specific features of genome evolution in the Saccharomycetaceae
Wolfe, K. H., Armisén, D., Proux‐Wéra, E., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Azam, H., Gordon, J., & Byrne, K. P. (2015) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fov035 · Cited by 64
Physical methods for genetic transformation of fungi and yeast
Rivera, A. L., Magaña-Ortíz, D., Gómez-Lim, M. Á., Fernández, F., & Loske, A. M. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2014.01.007 · Cited by 64
Solvent Exposure Imparts Similar Selective Pressures across a Range of Yeast Proteins
Conant, G. C., & Stadler, P. F. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp031 · Cited by 63
Comparative Analysis of Chromosome Counts Infers Three Paleopolyploidies in the Mollusca
Hallinan, N., & Lindberg, D. R. (2011) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evr087 · Cited by 65
Lipinski, K. A., Puchta, O., Surendranath, V., Kudla, M., & Golik, P. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr120 · Cited by 62
“2003), Vanderwaltozyma polyspora (Scannell et al. 2007), Kluyveromyces lactis (Zivanovic et al.”
BackgroundComparative Genomics of Two Sequential Candida glabrata Clinical Isolates
Vale-Silva, L., Beaudoing, E., Tran, V. D. T., & Sanglard, D. (2017) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.042887 · Cited by 61
“These Ty-like retrotransposons genes (named here Tkp5-1 to -9) were most similar to the Tkp5 protein from Vanderwaltozyma polyspora, a yeast representing the post-whole genome duplication (WGD) lineage most divergent from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Scannell et al. 2007).”
MethodPathogenic Allodiploid Hybrids of Aspergillus Fungi
Steenwyk, J. L., Lind, A., Ries, L. N. A., dos Reis, T. F., Silva, L. P., Almeida, F. B. D. R., Bastos, R. W., Fraga‐Silva, T. F. D. C., Bonato, V. L. D., Pessoni, A. M., et al. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.071 · Cited by 55
“For example, an ancient allodiploid hybridization event in the budding yeast lineage that includes the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [9] was quickly followed by rapid gene loss in the parental genomes [53], with estimates suggesting that 10% of genes were lost in the first 10 Ma following hybridization [53].”
BackgroundFitness benefits of loss of heterozygosity in Saccharomyces hybridsPreprint
Lancaster, S. M., Payen, C., Heil, C. S., & Dunham, M. J. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.245605.118 · Cited by 57
“Resolution of the ancestral whole genome duplication in Saccharomyces involved loss of the majority of duplicated genes, in a process that began shortly after the initial hybridization event (Scannell et al. 2007).”
Background“Changing by doubling”, the impact of Whole Genome Duplications in the evolution of eukaryotes
Jaillon, O., Aury, J., & Wincker, P. (2008) · Comptes Rendus Biologies · doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.007 · Cited by 58
Muir, A. K. S., Harrison, E., & Wheals, A. E. (2011) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00745.x · Cited by 55
“Saccharomyces cerevisiae itself is probably an autopolyploid (Scannell et al., 2007) and has undergone genome evolution while maximizing its ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Yeast Res 11 (2011) 552–563 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.”
BackgroundIntron Evolution in Saccharomycetaceae
Hooks, K. B., Delneri, D., & Griffiths‐Jones, S. (2014) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evu196 · Cited by 51
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.074450 · Cited by 53
“Probabilistic track assignment: Our original analysis assumed that every single-copy gene in a post-WGD genome could be unambiguously assigned as either a paralog or an ortholog of the corresponding genes in the other species (the ‘‘alignment’’ problem described in the Introduction; Scannell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSpecialized Sugar Sensing in Diverse Fungi
Brown, V. E., Sabina, J., & Johnston, M. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.056 · Cited by 52
“Data were compiled from references [3-8], in addition to the SGD database (www.”
Evolutionary Significance of Whole-Genome Duplication
McGrath, C., & Lynch, M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31442-1_1 · Cited by 49
Evangelisti, A. M., & Conant, G. C. (2010) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evq067 · Cited by 46
“1; Scannell et al. 2006, 2007).”
BackgroundUnique genes in plants: specificities and conserved features throughout evolution
Armisén, D., Lecharny, A., & Aubourg, S. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-280 · Cited by 46
“Indeed, evolution is not a one-direction process and a high proportion of duplicated genes are rapidly lost [6,16,17].”
BackgroundLaere, S. D. M. V., Saerens, S., Verstrepen, K. J., Dijck, P. V., Thevelein, J. M., & Delvaux, F. R. (2008) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-008-1366-9 · Cited by 46
“glabrata can be explained by speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss during evolution after the WGD (Scannell et al. 2006; Scannell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialWatching the grin fade: Tracing the effects of polyploidy on different evolutionary time scales
Mayfield‐Jones, D., Washburn, J. D., Arias, T., Edger, P. P., Pires, J. C., & Conant, G. C. (2013) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.02.002 · Cited by 46
Hayashi, A., Nagafuchi, H., Ito, I., Hirota, K., Yoshida, M., & Ozaki, S. (2009) · Modern Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10165-009-0151-7 · Cited by 45
Conant, G. C. (2014) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu250 · Cited by 47
Medina, E. M., Jones, G. W., & Fitzpatrick, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-011-9461-4 · Cited by 44
“polyspora has undergone a WGD (Scannell et al. 2007) and we expected it to form a monophyletic clade with the other WGD species.”
BackgroundInfluentialIntegrating Networks, Phylogenomics, and Population Genomics for the Study of Polyploidy
Blischak, P. D., Mabry, M. E., Conant, G. C., & Pires, J. C. (2018) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032302 · Cited by 41
Dietrich, F. S., Voegeli, S., Kuo, S., & Philippsen, P. (2013) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.112.002881 · Cited by 43
“All ORFs from the A aceri insect isolate 38 were also named following the A. gossypii nomenclature of the reference strain ATCC10895 irrespective of the translocations but adding an “ Aaceri ” prior to the systematic name.”
Evolution of the eukaryotic dynactin complex, the activator of cytoplasmic dynein
Hammesfahr, B., & Kollmar, M. (2012) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-95 · Cited by 43
“The absence of dynein and dynactin in Vanderwaltozyma is most likely related to the specific phenotypic feature that spores are formed by extra mitotic replications after meiosis independent of bud formation [75].”
Convergent Evolution and the Origin of Complex Phenotypes in the Age of Systems Biology
Washburn, J. D., Bird, K. A., Conant, G. C., & Pires, J. C. (2016) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/686009 · Cited by 43
“The majority of these duplicate genes are lost soon after the WGD event (Scannell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundThe lasting after-effects of an ancient polyploidy on the genomes of teleosts
Conant, G. C. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231356 · Cited by 42
“These last two states model the potential for the independent parallel losses first seen in yeast [40, 61].”
BackgroundMethodAbdullaeva, Y., Ratering, S., Manirajan, B. A., Rosado-Porto, D., Schnell, S., & Cardinale, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.806915 · Cited by 41
Co-Evolution of Transcriptional Silencing Proteins and the DNA Elements Specifying Their Assembly
Zill, O. A., Scannell, D. R., Teytelman, L., & Rine, J. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000550 · Cited by 40
“Although SIR2 and SIR3 each have a paralog resulting from the whole-genome duplication (SIR2 has three additional, more ancient paralogs), neither gene has experienced subsequent duplication or loss events [27,28].”
BackgroundDynamics of Gene Loss following Ancient Whole-Genome Duplication in the Cryptic Paramecium Complex
Goût, J.-F., Hao, Y., Johri, P., Arnaiz, O., Doak, T. G., Bhullar, S., Couloux, A., Guèrin, F., Malinsky, S., Potekhin, A. A., et al. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad107 · Cited by 53
“Application of the same analysis to non-Paramecium lineages having experienced a genome duplication (Jaillon et al. 2004; Scannell et al. 2007; Berthelot et al. 2014; Session et al. 2016; Ren et al. 2018) reveals that the rate of gene loss per synonymous substitution is lower in Paramecium than in…”
InfluentialRecent advances in understanding the roles of whole genome duplications in evolution
MacKintosh, C., & Ferrier, D. E. K. (2017) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.11792.1 · Cited by 37
“…suggest that around 4000 genes still existed in duplicate when these genera were diverging from each other, with subsequent losses of different paralogues in different lineages, such that, for example, S. cerevisiae now has 551 pairs of ohnologues and Candida glabrata has 404 pairs 55,67,74 .”
BackgroundRelaxation of yeast mitochondrial functions after whole-genome duplicationPreprint
Jiang, H., Guan, W., Pinney, D., Wang, W., & Gu, Z. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.074674.107 · Cited by 36
“castellii occurred ∼80–90 Mya (Scannell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundGuo, W., Wu, H., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Hu, L., Shi, X., Jian, S., Shi, S., & Huang, Y. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00795 · Cited by 36
“Previous studies have reported a pattern of parallel paleolog retention in several different lineages (Aury et al., 2006; Schranz and Mitchell-Olds, 2006; Scannell et al., 2007; Barker et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMechanism of MRX inhibition by Rif2 at telomeres
Roisné-Hamelin, F., Pobiega, S., Jézéquel, K., Miron, S. M., Dépagne, J., Veaute, X., Busso, D., Du, M. L., Callebaut, I., Charbonnier, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23035-w · Cited by 36
“Mutations in the F8 and R12 residues, C-terminal truncation past residue 26 and a N-terminal truncation (6-31) weaken or abolish the interaction with Rad50 (Fig.”
BackgroundInfluentialWidespread Recurrent Evolution of Genomic Features
Maeso, I., Roy, S. W., & Irimia, M. (2012) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evs022 · Cited by 38
Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication
Xiong, H., Wang, D., Shao, C., Yang, X., Yang, J., Ma, T., Davis, C. “., Liu, L., & Xi, Z. (2022) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac040 · Cited by 33
“For example, convergent loss of paralogs has shown to be about three times more frequent than reciprocal loss of paralogs in yeasts [09:05 27/9/2022 Sysbio-OP-SYSB220040.tex] Page: 1353 1348–1361 (Scannell et al. 2006; Scannell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundPfliegler, W. P., Antunovics, Z., & Sipiczki, M. (2012) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00820.x · Cited by 35
Coate, J. E., Song, M. J., Bombarely, A., & Doyle, J. J. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14090 · Cited by 35
“Within a few million yr, however, most duplicated genes are silenced and/or removed from the genome (Lynch & Conery, 2000, 2003; Otto & Whitton, 2000; Blanc & Wolfe, 2004; Scannell et al., 2007; Moghe et al., 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Scannell, D. R., Frank, A. C., Conant, G. C., Byrne, K. P., Woolfit, M., & Wolfe, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-05-15
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8397-8402
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1895961
- OpenAlex
- W2064322162
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 28.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- whole-genome duplication, gene loss, paralogs, orthologs, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yeast evolution, autopolyploidization, gene family evolution, genome size reduction
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Kluyveromyces, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Time Factors, Likelihood Functions, Genome, Fungal, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, Genes, Duplicate, Gene Duplication, Gene Order
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
