The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme
Open accessAbstract
Bacteriophage lytic enzymes quickly destroy the cell wall of the host bacterium to release progeny phage. Because such lytic enzymes specifically kill the species in which they were produced, they may represent an effective way to control pathogenic bacteria without disturbing normal microflora. In this report, we studied a murein hydrolase from the streptococcal bacteriophage C 1 termed lysin. This enzyme is specific for groups A, C, and E streptococci, with little or no activity toward several oral streptococci or other commensal organisms tested. Using purified lysin in vitro, we show that 1,000 units (10 ng) of enzyme is sufficient to sterilize a culture of ≈10 7 group A streptococci within 5 seconds. When a single dose of lysin (250 units) is first added to the oral cavity of mice, followed by 10 7 live group A streptococci, it provides protection from colonization (28.5% infected,n= 21) compared with controls without lysin (70.5% infected,n= 17) (P< 0.03). Furthermore, when lysin (500 units) was given orally to 9 heavily colonized mice, no detectable streptococci were observed 2 h after lysin treatment. In all, these studies show that lysin represents a unique murein hydrolase that has a rapid lethal effect both in vitro and in vivo on group A streptococci, without affecting other indigenous microorganisms analyzed. This general approach may be used to either eliminate or reduce streptococci from the upper respiratory mucosal epithelium of either carriers or infected individuals, thus reducing associated disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
von Eiff, C., Becker, K., Machka, K., Stammer, H., & Peters, G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101043440102 · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
Bacteriophage lysins as effective antibacterials
Fischetti, V. A. (2008) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.012 · Cited by 477
Self-citationBacteriophage endolysins: A novel anti-infective to control Gram-positive pathogens
Fischetti, V. A. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.002 · Cited by 438
Self-citationMaciejewska, B., Olszak, T., & Drulis-Kawa, Z. (2018) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-8811-1 · Cited by 222
Recent trends on the molecular biology of pneumococcal capsules, lytic enzymes, and bacteriophage
López, R., & García, E. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.05.002 · Cited by 187
Differential Recognition of Surface Proteins in Streptococcus pyogenes by Two Sortase Gene Homologs
Barnett, T. C., & Scott, J. R. (2002) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.184.8.2181-2191.2002 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, D., Loomis, L., & Fischetti, V. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-03-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4107-4112
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2154066176
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.061038398
- The paper
- Nelson, D., Loomis, L., & Fischetti, V. A. (2001). Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061038398
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.