The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations
Open accessAbstract
Cooperative interactions are key to diverse biological phenomena ranging from multicellularity to mutualism. Such diversity makes the ability to create and control cooperation desirable for potential applications in areas as varied as agriculture, pollutant treatment, and medicine. Here we show that persistent cooperation can be engineered by introducing a small set of genetic modifications into previously noninteracting cell populations. Specifically, we report the construction of a synthetic obligatory cooperative system, termed CoSMO ( co operation that is s ynthetic and m utually o bligatory), which consists of a pair of nonmating yeast strains, each supplying an essential metabolite to the other strain. The behavior of the two strains in isolation, however, revealed unintended constraints that restrict cooperation, such as asymmetry in starvation tolerance and delays in nutrient release until near cell death. However, the joint system is shown mathematically and experimentally to be viable over a wide range of initial conditions, with oscillating population ratio settling to a value predicted by nutrient supply and consumption. Unexpectedly, even in the absence of explicitly engineered mechanisms to stabilize cooperation, the cooperative system can consistently develop increased ability to survive reductions in population density. Extending synthetic biology from the design of genetic circuits to the engineering of ecological interactions, CoSMO provides a quantitative system for linking processes at the cellular level to the collective behavior at the system level, as well as a genetically tractable system for studying the evolution of cooperation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems
Purnick, P. E. M., & Weiss, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2698 · Cited by 1,181
Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology
Brenner, K., You, L., & Arnold, F. H. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.05.004 · Cited by 1,018
Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions
Kramer, J., Özkaya, Ö., & Kümmerli, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0284-4 · Cited by 998
Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast
Gore, J., Youk, H., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07921 · Cited by 668
Co-culture systems and technologies: taking synthetic biology to the next level
Goers, L., Freemont, P., & Polizzi, K. M. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0065 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Shou, W., Ram, S., & Vilar, J. M. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-02-06
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1877-1882
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2169010693
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0610575104
- The paper
- Shou, W., Ram, S., & Vilar, J. M. G. (2007). Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610575104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.