Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness

Open access
Davis, Matthew H., Coleman, Martin R., Absalom, Anthony R., Rodd, Jennifer M., Johnsrude, Ingrid S., Matta, Basil F., Owen, Adrian M., Menon, David K.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We used functional MRI and the anesthetic agent propofol to assess the relationship among neural responses to speech, successful comprehension, and conscious awareness. Volunteers were scanned while listening to sentences containing ambiguous words, matched sentences without ambiguous words, and signal-correlated noise (SCN). During three scanning sessions, participants were nonsedated (awake), lightly sedated (a slowed response to conversation), and deeply sedated (no conversational response, rousable by loud command). Bilateral temporal-lobe responses for sentences compared with signal-correlated noise were observed at all three levels of sedation, although prefrontal and premotor responses to speech were absent at the deepest level of sedation. Additional inferior frontal and posterior temporal responses to ambiguous sentences provide a neural correlate of semantic processes critical for comprehending sentences containing ambiguous words. However, this additional response was absent during light sedation, suggesting a marked impairment of sentence comprehension. A significant decline in postscan recognition memory for sentences also suggests that sedation impaired encoding of sentences into memory, with left inferior frontal and temporal lobe responses during light sedation predicting subsequent recognition memory. These findings suggest a graded degradation of cognitive function in response to sedation such that “higher-level” semantic and mnemonic processes can be impaired at relatively low levels of sedation, whereas perceptual processing of speech remains resilient even during deep sedation. These results have important implications for understanding the relationship between speech comprehension and awareness in the healthy brain in patients receiving sedation and in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0701309104

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150883.10285.44 · DOI · Paper page
  2. MR Coleman, JM Rodd, MHJ Davis, IS, DK Menon, AM Owen Brain, in press. (2007).
  3. 10.1126/science.1130197 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/bja/ael017 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00011 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/bja/aeh133 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/cercor/bhi009 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/brain/123.12.2400 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03423.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2810 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.3758/BF03197692 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245 · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.048 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/s001340051150 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00037-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.2410_1.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.2410_1.x
  18. 10.1097/00000542-199704000-00014 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/02724990444000113 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00169-0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1121/1.1639336 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1162/0898929041502616 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/89551 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1121/1.1907229 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/17470215908416289 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1121/1.2190162 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16300-9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)11010-9 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1126/science.281.5380.1188 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/nn967 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S1536-1632(01)00006-3 · DOI
  34. 10.1121/1.1911323 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:3<213::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · DOI · Paper page
  37. RNA Henson, W Penny ANOVAs in SPM, Technical Report (Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, 2003).
  38. DK Menon Fundamentals of Anaesthesia and Acute Medicine, eds H-J Priebe, K Skarvan (BMJ Publications, London, 2000).
  39. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.005 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Davis, M. H., Coleman, M. R., Absalom, A. R., Rodd, J. M., Johnsrude, I. S., Matta, B. F., Owen, A. M., & Menon, D. K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-10-09
Volume
104
Issue
41
Pages
16032-16037
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2099497475
Cited by
260
References
5
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0701309104
The paper
Davis, M. H., Coleman, M. R., Absalom, A. R., Rodd, J. M., Johnsrude, I. S., Matta, B. F., Owen, A. M., & Menon, D. K. (2007). Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701309104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.