Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The phytopathogenic bacteria Erwinia carotovora infects Drosophila and activates an immune response

Open access
Alan Basset, Ranjiv S Khush, Anne Braun, Louis Gardan B, Frédéric Boccard, Jules A. Hoffmann, Bruno Lemaître·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although Drosophila possesses potent immune responses, little is known about the microbial pathogens that infect Drosophila. We have identified members of the bacterial genus Erwinia that induce the systemic expression of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila larvae after ingestion. These Erwinia strains are phytopathogens and use flies as vectors; our data suggest that these strains have also evolved mechanisms for exploiting their insect vectors as hosts. Erwinia infections induce an antimicrobial response in Drosophila larvae with a preferential expression of antibacterial versus antifungal peptide-encoding genes. Antibacterial peptide gene expression after Erwinia infection is reduced in two Drosophila mutants that have reduced numbers of hemocytes, suggesting that blood cells play a role in regulating Drosophila antimicrobial responses and also illustrating that this Drosophila-Erwinia interaction provides a powerful model for dissecting host-pathogen relationships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1073/pnas.070357597

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. G N Agrios Plant Pathology (Academic, 4th Ed., New York, 1997).
  2. 10.1007/BF02851435 · doi:10.1007/bf02851435
  3. 10.1007/BF02854416 · doi:10.1007/bf02854416
  4. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb33578.x · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb33578.x
  5. 10.1016/0965-1748(94)00091-C · doi:10.1016/0965-1748(94)00091-c
  6. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16648.x · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16648.x
  7. 10.1017/S0031182000084973 · doi:10.1017/s0031182000084973
  8. 10.1128/mmbr.61.2.136-169.1997 · doi:10.1128/mmbr.61.2.136-169.1997 · Paper page
  9. C Flyg, K Kenne, H G Boman J Gen Microbiol 120, 173–181 (1980).

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Basset, A., Khush, R. S., Braun, A., Louis Gardan, B., Boccard, F., Hoffmann, J. A., & Lemaître, B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-03-21
Volume
97
Issue
7
Pages
3376-3381
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4242475063
Cited by
384
References
17
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phytopathogenic bacteria Erwinia carotovora infects Drosophila and activates an immune response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.070357597
The paper
Basset, A., Khush, R. S., Braun, A., Louis Gardan, B., Boccard, F., Hoffmann, J. A., & Lemaître, B. (2000). The phytopathogenic bacteria Erwinia carotovora infects Drosophila and activates an immune response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070357597

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.