The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Gut homeostasis is controlled by both immune and developmental mechanisms, and its disruption can lead to inflammatory disorders or cancerous lesions of the intestine. While the impact of bacteria on the mucosal immune system is beginning to be precisely understood, little is known about the effects of bacteria on gut epithelium renewal. Here, we addressed how both infectious and indigenous bacteria modulate stem cell activity in Drosophila. We show that the increased epithelium renewal observed upon some bacterial infections is a consequence of the oxidative burst, a major defense of the Drosophila gut. Additionally, we provide evidence that the JAK–STAT (Janus kinase–signal transducers and activators of transcription) and JNK (c-Jun NH 2 terminal kinase) pathways are both required for bacteria-induced stem cell proliferation. Similarly, we demonstrate that indigenous gut microbiota activate the same, albeit reduced, program at basal levels. Altered control of gut microbiota in immune-deficient or aged flies correlates with increased epithelium renewal. Finally, we show that epithelium renewal is an essential component of Drosophila defense against oral bacterial infection. Altogether, these results indicate that gut homeostasis is achieved by a complex interregulation of the immune response, gut microbiota, and stem cell activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development
Hooper, L. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.01.001 · Cited by 541 · cited 1×
“entomophila (Jiang et al. 2009). This work and our study clearly demonstrate that the JAK–STAT pathway adjusts the level of epithelium renewal to ensure proper tissue homeostasis by linking enterocyte damage to ISC proliferation. In the study by Jiang et al. (2009), they also uncover an additional role of this pathway…”
Cited by
The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology
Sommer, F., & Bäckhed, F. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2974 · Cited by 3,681
Sleep Loss Can Cause Death through Accumulation of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Gut
Vaccaro, A., Kaplan Dor, Y., Nambara, K., Pollina, E. A., Lin, C., Greenberg, M. E., & Rogulja, D. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.049 · Cited by 541
Clark, R. I., Salazar, A., Yamada, R., Fitz-Gibbon, S., Morselli, M., Alcaraz, J., Rana, A., Rera, M., Pellegrini, M., Ja, W. W., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004 · Cited by 510
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Adult Midgut Compartmentalization in Drosophila
Buchon, N., Osman, D., David, F. P. A., Yu Fang, H., Boquete, J.-P., Deplancke, B., & Lemaitre, B. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.001 · Cited by 513
Self-citationAnatomy and Physiology of the Digestive Tract of Drosophila melanogaster
Miguel-Aliaga, I., Jasper, H., & Lemaitre, B. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.118.300224 · Cited by 491
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Chakrabarti, S., & Lemaitre, B.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2333-2344
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2105575647
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1827009
- The paper
- Buchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Chakrabarti, S., & Lemaitre, B. (2009). Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in Drosophila. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1827009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.