The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DrosophilaEGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Gut homeostasis is central to whole organism health, and its disruption is associated with a broad range of pathologies. Following damage, complex physiological events are required in the gut to maintain proper homeostasis. Previously, we demonstrated that ingestion of a nonlethal pathogen, Erwinia carotovora carotovora 15, induces a massive increase in stem cell proliferation in the gut of Drosophila. However, the precise cellular events that occur following infection have not been quantitatively described, nor do we understand the interaction between multiple pathways that have been implicated in epithelium renewal. RESULTS: To understand the process of infection and epithelium renewal in more detail, we performed a quantitative analysis of several cellular and morphological characteristics of the gut. We observed that the gut of adult Drosophila undergoes a dynamic remodeling in response to bacterial infection. This remodeling coordinates the synthesis of new enterocytes, their proper morphogenesis and the elimination of damaged cells through delamination and anoikis. We demonstrate that one signaling pathway, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, is key to controlling each of these steps through distinct functions in intestinal stem cells and enterocytes. The EGFR pathway is activated by the EGF ligands, Spitz, Keren and Vein, the latter being induced in the surrounding visceral muscles in part under the control of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway. Additionally, the EGFR pathway synergizes with the JAK/STAT pathway in stem cells to promote their proliferation. Finally, we show that the EGFR pathway contributes to gut morphogenesis through its activity in enterocytes and is required to properly coordinate the delamination and anoikis of damaged cells. This function of the EGFR pathway in enterocytes is key to maintaining homeostasis, as flies lacking EGFR are highly susceptible to infection. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that restoration of normal gut morphology following bacterial infection is a more complex phenomenon than previously described. Maintenance of gut homeostasis requires the coordination of stem cell proliferation and differentiation, with the incorporation and morphogenesis of new cells and the expulsion of damaged enterocytes. We show that one signaling pathway, the EGFR pathway, is central to all these stages, and its activation at multiple steps could synchronize the complex cellular events leading to gut repair and homeostasis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease
Turner, J. R. (2009) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2653 · Cited by 3,952
Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium
Micchelli, C. A., & Perrimon, N. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04371 · Cited by 1,131
The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells
Ohlstein, B., & Spradling, A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04333 · Cited by 1,083
Immunity, Inflammation, and Allergy in the Gut
MacDonald, T. T., & Monteleone, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106442 · Cited by 1,035
Cytokine/Jak/Stat Signaling Mediates Regeneration and Homeostasis in the Drosophila Midgut
Jiang, H., Patel, P. H., Kohlmaier, A., Grenley, M. O., McEwen, D. G., & Edgar, B. A. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.014 · Cited by 1,013
Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development
Lee, T., & Luo, L. (2001) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01791-4 · Cited by 926
Buchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Poidevin, M., Pradervand, S., & Lemaitre, B. (2009) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2009.01.003 · Cited by 838
Self-citationBuchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Chakrabarti, S., & Lemaitre, B. (2009) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1827009 · Cited by 721
Self-citationSelf-Renewal and Cancer of the Gut: Two Sides of a Coin
Radtke, F., & Clevers, H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104815 · Cited by 690
Gilmore, A. P. (2005) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401723 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Anatomy and Physiology of the Digestive Tract of Drosophila melanogaster
Miguel-Aliaga, I., Jasper, H., & Lemaitre, B. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.118.300224 · Cited by 491
PGRP-SC2 Promotes Gut Immune Homeostasis to Limit Commensal Dysbiosis and Extend Lifespan
Guo, L., Karpac, J., Tran, S. L., & Jasper, H. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.018 · Cited by 462
Maintaining Tissue Homeostasis: Dynamic Control of Somatic Stem Cell Activity
Biteau, B., Hochmuth, C. E., & Jasper, H. (2011) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.10.004 · Cited by 314
Dutta, D., Dobson, A. J., Houtz, P. L., Gläßer, C., Revah, J., Korzelius, J., Patel, P. H., Edgar, B. A., & Buchon, N. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.009 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Kuraishi, T., & Lemaitre, B.
- Venue
- BMC Biology
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-152
- ISSN
- 1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972693900
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DrosophilaEGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7007-8-152
- The paper
- Buchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Kuraishi, T., & Lemaitre, B. (2010). DrosophilaEGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection. BMC Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.