Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial gradients in Clovis-age radiocarbon dates across North America suggest rapid colonization from the north

Hamilton, Marcus J., Buchanan, Briggs·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A key issue in the debate over the initial colonization of North America is whether there are spatial gradients in the distribution of the Clovis-age occupations across the continent. Such gradients would help indicate the timing, speed, and direction of the colonization process. In their recent reanalysis of Clovis-age radiocarbon dates, Waters and Stafford [Waters MR, Stafford TW, Jr (2007) Science 315:1122–1126] report that they find no spatial patterning. Furthermore, they suggest that the brevity of the Clovis time period indicates that the Clovis culture represents the diffusion of a technology across a preexisting pre-Clovis population rather than a population expansion. In this article, we focus on two questions. First, we ask whether there is spatial patterning to the timing of Clovis-age occupations and, second, whether the observed speed of colonization is consistent with demic processes. With time-delayed wave-of-advance models, we use the radiocarbon record to test several alternative colonization hypotheses. We find clear spatial gradients in the distribution of these dates across North America, which indicate a rapid wave of advance originating from the north. We show that the high velocity of this wave can be accounted for by a combination of demographic processes, habitat preferences, and mobility biases across complex landscapes. Our results suggest that the Clovis-age archaeological record represents a rapid demic colonization event originating from the north.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0704215104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estimates for more recent palaeolithic hominins range from 1 to 10 km/yr.

    “Estimates are available for more recent palaeolithic hominins, ranging from 1 to 10 km/yr43–45.”

    From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

  • The distribution of the Clovis-age occupations across North America suggests a speed of 5-8 km/yr.

    “The distribution of the Clovis-age occupations across North America suggests a speed of 5-8 km/yr44.”

    From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. CV Haynes Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, eds R Bonnichsen, BT Lepper, D Stanford, MR Waters (Texas A&M Press, College Station, TX), pp. 113–132 (2005).
  2. 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00115-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. EJ Dixon Bones, Boats, and Bison: Archaeology and the First Colonization of North America (Univ of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, 1999).
  4. 10.2307/2694807 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/0043824042000303656 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.1137166 · DOI · Paper page
  7. JE Mosimann, PS Martin Am Sci 63, 304–313 (1975).
  8. PS Martin Pleistocene Extinctions: The Search for a Cause, eds PS Martin, HE Wright (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT), pp. 75–120 (1967).
  9. 10.2307/277806 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/2694175 · DOI
  11. JM Adovasio, D Pedler, J Donahue, R Stuckenrath Ice Age People of North America: Environments, Origins, and Adaptations of the First Americans, eds R Bonnichsen, KL Turnmire (Oregon State Univ Press for the Center for the Study of the First Americans, Corvallis, OR), pp. 416–431 (1999).
  12. JM McAvoy, LD McAvoy Archaeological Investigations of Site 44SX202, Cactus Hill, Sussex County Virginia (Dept Hist Resour, Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond, VA, 1997).
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.867 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.5894 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0003598X00092577 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.031913 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0959774304000046 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030410 · DOI
  19. 10.1088/0034-4885/65/6/201 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/ajhb.20510 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/200047 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/2801706 · DOI
  23. CV Haynes, DJ Donahue, AJT Jull, TH Zabel Archaeol East N Am 12, 184–191 (1984).
  24. 10.1017/S0033822200032999 · DOI · Paper page
  25. AJ Ammerman, LL Cavalli-Sforza The Explanation of Culture Change, ed C Renfrew (Duckworth, London, 1973).
  26. 10.1016/j.jaa.2007.02.005 · DOI
  27. CM Barton, S Schmich, SR James The Settlement of the American Continents, eds CM Barton, GA Clark, DA Yesner, GA Pearson (Univ of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 138–161 (2004).
  28. 10.1126/science.1109792 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1023/A:1009400309773 · DOI
  30. SJ Fiedel The Settlement of the American Continents: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Human Biogeography, eds CM Barton, GA Clark, DA Yesner, GA Pearson (Univ of Utah Press, Salt Lake City), pp. 79–84 (2004).
  31. 10.1016/j.jas.2003.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1209/epl/i2004-10114-9 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.240601 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0501947102 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/00438243.1998.9980411 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF00975121 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.031115 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.09.001 · DOI
  39. E Bertuzzo, A Maritan, M Gatto, I Rodriguez-Iturbe, A Rinaldo Water Resour Res 43, W04419 (2007).
  40. 10.1073/pnas.0611197104 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s10745-006-9083-4 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0564 · DOI
  43. GC Frison Curr Res Pleistocene 17, 28–29 (2000).
  44. 10.1080/2052546.1998.11931884 · DOI
  45. GF MacDonald Debert: A Palaeo-Indian Site in Central Nova Scotia (National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, 1968).
  46. MA Levine Archaeol East N Am 18, 33–63 (1990).
  47. A Spiess, J Mosher Maine Archaeol Soc Bull 34, 25–54 (1994).
  48. A Spiess, J Mosher, K Callum, NA Sidell Maine Archaeol Soc Bull 35, 13–52 (1995).
  49. RS Laub The Hiscock Site: Late Pleistocene and Holocene Paleoecology and Archaeology of Western New York State, ed RS Laub (Bull Buffalo Soc Nat Sci, Buffalo, NY) Vol 37, 18–38 (2003).
  50. MR Gramly The Vail Site: A Paleo-Indian Encampment in Maine (Bull Buffalo Soc Nat Sci, Buffalo, NY) Vol 30 (1982).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hamilton, M. J., & Buchanan, B.
Affiliations
  • *Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; and
  • Department of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-10-02
Volume
104
Issue
40
Pages
15625-15630
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
113
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review