Cited by 288Ion channel regulation and functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Quantitative expression profiling of identified neurons reveals cell-specific constraints on highly variable levels of gene expression

Open access
Schulz, David J., Goaillard, Jean-Marc, Marder, Eve E.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The postdevelopmental basis of cellular identity and the unique cellular output of a particular neuron type are of particular interest in the nervous system because a detailed understanding of circuits responsible for complex processes in the brain is impeded by the often ambiguous classification of neurons in these circuits. Neurons have been classified by morphological, electrophysiological, and neurochemical techniques. More recently, molecular approaches, particularly microarray, have been applied to the question of neuronal identity. With the realization that proteins expressed exclusively in only one type of neuron are rare, expression profiles obtained from neuronal subtypes are analyzed to search for diagnostic patterns of gene expression. However, this expression profiling hinges on one critical and implicit assumption: that neurons of the same type in different animals achieve their conserved functional output via conserved levels and quantitative relationships of gene expression. Here we exploit the unambiguously identifiable neurons in the crab stomatogastric ganglion to investigate the precise quantitative expression profiling of neurons at the level of single-cell ion channel expression. By measuring absolute mRNA levels of six different channels in the same individually identified neurons, we demonstrate that not only do individual cell types possess highly variable levels of channel expression but that this variability is constrained by unique patterns of correlated channel expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0705827104

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In wild-type populations of animals with similar performance profiles, 2-7 fold variations in the mRNA expression of most cellular components are seen in identified neurons across individuals.

    “In wild-type populations of animals with similar performance profiles, 2-7 fold variations in the mRNA expression of most cellular components are seen in identified neurons across individuals [25-30]”

    From A feature and not a bug: Replication failures can lead to new biology (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results report 3- to 5-fold variation in ion-channel mRNA among identified neurons of the same type, and the Discussion describes these neurons as maintaining constant network function. The paper measured six ion-channel genes in crab neurons; it does not establish a 2- to 7-fold range or extend the finding to most cellular components. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It is common for investigators to look for correlations between the expression of individual components or features to obtain insight into how individual system components contribute to system behavior.

    “It is common for investigators to look for correlations between the expression of individual components or features to obtain insight into how individual system components contribute to system behavior [26,[60][61][62].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, D. J., Goaillard, J.-M., & Marder, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-08-07
Volume
104
Issue
32
Pages
13187-13191
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2065914874
Cited by
288
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0615160)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • University of Missouri
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 46742, R37MH046742, R01MH046742)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
neuronal identity, gene expression variation, stomatogastric ganglion, ion channels, single-cell expression profiling, mRNA levels, correlated gene expression, neuronal cell types, crabs
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Brachyura, Ion Channels, Molecular Sequence Data, Neurons, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review