The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genetic basis of a plant–insect coevolutionary key innovation
Open accessAbstract
Ehrlich and Raven formally introduced the concept of stepwise coevolution using butterfly and angiosperm interactions in an attempt to account for the impressive biological diversity of these groups. However, many biologists currently envision butterflies evolving 50 to 30 million years (Myr) after the major angiosperm radiation and thus reject coevolutionary origins of butterfly biodiversity. The unresolved central tenet of Ehrlich and Raven's theory is that evolution of plant chemical defenses is followed closely by biochemical adaptation in insect herbivores, and that newly evolved detoxification mechanisms result in adaptive radiation of herbivore lineages. Using one of their original butterfly-host plant systems, the Pieridae, we identify a pierid glucosinolate detoxification mechanism, nitrile-specifier protein (NSP), as a key innovation. Larval NSP activity matches the distribution of glucosinolate in their host plants. Moreover, by using five different temporal estimates, NSP seems to have evolved shortly after the evolution of the host plant group (Brassicales) (≈10 Myr). An adaptive radiation of these glucosinolate-feeding Pierinae followed, resulting in significantly elevated species numbers compared with related clades. Mechanistic understanding in its proper historical context documents more ancient and dynamic plant–insect interactions than previously envisioned. Moreover, these mechanistic insights provide the tools for detailed molecular studies of coevolution from both the plant and insect perspectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025892 · Cited by 1,317
Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data.
Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102456 · Cited by 962
Performance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution.
Kishino, H., Thorne, J. L., & Bruno, W. J. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003811 · Cited by 633
Ho, S. Y. W. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi125 · Cited by 190
The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps
Renwick, J. A. A. (2002) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2002.00988.x · Cited by 170
Cited by
Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations
YODER, J. B., CLANCEY, E., DES ROCHES, S., EASTMAN, J. M., GENTRY, L., GODSOE, W., HAGEY, T. J., JOCHIMSEN, D., OSWALD, B. P., ROBERTSON, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x · Cited by 731
Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores
Futuyma, D. J., & Agrawal, A. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904106106 · Cited by 632
The butterfly plant arms-race escalated by gene and genome duplications
Edger, P. P., Heidel-Fischer, H. M., Bekaert, M., Rota, J., Glöckner, G., Platts, A. E., Heckel, D. G., Der, J. P., Wafula, E. K., Tang, M., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1503926112 · Cited by 527
Self-citationMolecular mechanisms of insect adaptation to plant secondary compounds
Heidel-Fischer, H. M., & Vogel, H. (2015) · Current Opinion in Insect Science · doi:10.1016/j.cois.2015.02.004 · Cited by 338
Self-citationBehavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help
DICKE, M. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01913.x · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheat, C. W., Vogel, H., Wittstock, U., Braby, M. F., Underwood, D., & Mitchell-Olds, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 20427-20431
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2023182268
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 27.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genetic basis of a plant–insect coevolutionary key innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0706229104
- The paper
- Wheat, C. W., Vogel, H., Wittstock, U., Braby, M. F., Underwood, D., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2007). The genetic basis of a plant–insect coevolutionary key innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706229104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.