Cited by 1,021Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems

Open access
Izhikevich, Eugene M., Edelman, Gerald M.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The understanding of the structural and dynamic complexity of mammalian brains is greatly facilitated by computer simulations. We present here a detailed large-scale thalamocortical model based on experimental measures in several mammalian species. The model spans three anatomical scales. ( i ) It is based on global (white-matter) thalamocortical anatomy obtained by means of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of a human brain. ( ii ) It includes multiple thalamic nuclei and six-layered cortical microcircuitry based on in vitro labeling and three-dimensional reconstruction of single neurons of cat visual cortex. ( iii ) It has 22 basic types of neurons with appropriate laminar distribution of their branching dendritic trees. The model simulates one million multicompartmental spiking neurons calibrated to reproduce known types of responses recorded in vitro in rats. It has almost half a billion synapses with appropriate receptor kinetics, short-term plasticity, and long-term dendritic spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity (dendritic STDP). The model exhibits behavioral regimes of normal brain activity that were not explicitly built-in but emerged spontaneously as the result of interactions among anatomical and dynamic processes. We describe spontaneous activity, sensitivity to changes in individual neurons, emergence of waves and rhythms, and functional connectivity on different scales.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0712231105

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptive resonance can account for binding among visual feature maps, a basic property of visual perception.

    “Adaptive resonance has many useful properties, as shown in modeling studies like the Darwin autonomous robot series, where it can account for binding among visual feature maps, a basic property of visual perception (Figure 2) (Izhikevich and Edelman, 2008).”

    From Global Workspace Dynamics: Cortical “Binding and Propagation” Enables Conscious Contents (2013) · cites this paper as Izhikevich and Edelman, 2008

    The Abstract describes a large-scale thalamocortical simulation, and the Discussion describes its spontaneous rhythms, propagating waves, and functional connectivity. Searches for adaptive resonance, the Darwin autonomous robot series, and binding among visual feature maps found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Spatiotopic activity maps can bind into coherent gestalts using adaptive resonance (reentry).

    “Spatiotopic activity maps can bind into coherent gestalts using adaptive resonance (reentry).”

    From Global Workspace Dynamics: Cortical “Binding and Propagation” Enables Conscious Contents (2013) · cites this paper as Izhikevich and Edelman, 2008

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports spontaneous rhythms, propagating waves, and anticorrelated functional clusters, but does not say that spatiotopic maps bind into gestalts. Searches for spatiotopic maps, binding, adaptive resonance, and reentry found no passage addressing that mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [1]Lumer ED, Edelman GM, Tononi G. Neural dynamics in a model of the thalamocortical system. I. Layers, loops and the emergence of fast synchronous rhythms. Cereb Cortex. 1997;7:207–227. doi: 10.1093/cercor/7.3.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Lumer ED, Edelman GM, Tononi G. Neural dynamics in a model of the thalamocortical system. II. The role of neural synchrony tested through perturbations of spike timing. Cereb Cortex. 1997;7:228–236. doi: 10.1093/cercor/7.3.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Markram H. The blue brain project. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:153–160. doi: 10.1038/nrn1848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Nunez PL, Srinivasan R. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG. 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford Univ Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Fox MD, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Schultz W. Reward. Scholarpedia. 2007;2:1652. [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Schultz W. Reward signals. Scholarpedia. 2007;2:2184. [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Weinstein D, Kindlmann G, Lundberg E. Tensorlines: Advection-diffusion based propagation through diffusion tensor fields.. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visualization '99: Celebrating Ten Years; Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1999. pp. 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Mori S, van Zijl PCM. Fiber tracking: Principles and strategies–a technical review. NRM Biomed. 2002;15:468–480. doi: 10.1002/nbm.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Binzegger T, Douglas RJ, Martin KAC. A quantitative map of the circuit of cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8441–8453. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1400-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [12]Izhikevich EM. Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. [13]Skinner FK. Conductance-based models. Scholarpedia. 2006;1:1408. [Google Scholar]
  13. [14]Connors BW, Gutnick MJ. Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:99–104. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90185-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [16]Beierlein M, Gibson JR, Connors BW. Two dynamically distinct inhibitory networks in layer 4 of the neocortex. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:2987–3000. doi: 10.1152/jn.00283.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Levy WB, Steward O. Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience. 1983;8:791–797. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [18]Gerstner W, Kempter R, van Hemmen JL, Wagner H. A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature. 1996;383:76–78. doi: 10.1038/383076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [19]Markram H, Lubke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science. 1997;275:213–215. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5297.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  18. [20]Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci. 1998;18:10464–10472. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  19. [21]Izhikevich EM. Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:2443–2452. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [22]Timofeev I, Grenier F, Bazhenov M, Seijowski TJ, Steriade M. Origin and slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:1185–1199. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.12.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  21. [23]Muresan RC, Savin C. Resonance or Integration? Self-sustained dynamics and excitability of neural microcircuits. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1911–1930. doi: 10.1152/jn.01043.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [24]Izhikevich EM, Gally JA, Edelman GM. Spike-timing dynamics of neuronal groups. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:933–944. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [25]Izhikevich EM. Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Comput. 2006;18:245–282. doi: 10.1162/089976606775093882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [26]Ananthanarayanan R, Modha DS. Anatomy of a Cortical Simulator,. Supercomputing 07: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2007 Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing; New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. [27]Bazhenov M, Timofeev I. Thalamocortical oscillations. Scholarpedia. 2006;1:1319. [Google Scholar]
  26. [28]Bao W, Wu J-Y. Propagating wave and irregular dynamics: Spatiotemporal patterns of cholinergic theta oscillations in neocortex in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:333–341. doi: 10.1152/jn.00715.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [29]Xu W, Huang X, Takagaki K, Wu J-Y. Compression and reflection of visually evoked cortical waves. Neuron. 2007;55:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [30]Rubino D, Robbins KA, Hatsopoloulos NG. Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1549–1557. doi: 10.1038/nn1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [31]Prechtl JC, Cohen LB, Pesaran B, Mitra PP, Kleinfeld D. Visual stimuli induce waves of electrical activity in turtle cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:7621–7626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [32]Honey CJ, Kotter R, Breakspear M, Sporns O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10240–10245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [33]Swadlow HA. Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in motor cortex of the awake rabbit: Axonal properties, sensory receptive fields, and subthreshold synaptic inputs. J Neurophysiol. 1994;71:437–453. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.2.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [34]Latham PE, Roth A, Hausser M, London M. Requiem for the spike? Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2006;32:432.12. [Google Scholar]
  33. [35]Banerjee A. On the sensitive dependence on initial conditions of the dynamics of networks of spiking neurons. J comput Neurosci. 2006;20:321–348. doi: 10.1007/s10827-006-7188-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. [36]Vallbo ÅB, Olsson KÅ, Westberg K-G, Clark FJ. Microstimulation of single tactile afferents from the human hand: Sensory attributes related to unit type and properties of receptive fields. Brain. 1984;107:727–749. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.3.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  35. [37]Houweling AR, Brecht M. Behavioural report of single neuron stimulation in somatosensory cortex. Nature. 2008;451:65–68. doi: 10.1038/nature06447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Izhikevich, E. M., & Edelman, G. M.
Affiliations
Neurosciences Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-03-04
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
3593-3598
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2152502378
Cited by
1,021
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 85
FWCI
35.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Max Planck School of Photonics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
thalamocortical system, large-scale neural models, short-term plasticity, diffusion tensor imaging, thalamic nuclei, cat visual cortex, spontaneous brain activity, neural oscillations, functional connectivity, receptor kinetics
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Cats, Cerebral Cortex, Computer Simulation, Humans, Mammals, Models, Biological, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Synapses, Thalamic Nuclei, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review