The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice
Open accessAbstract
Defining prospective pathways by which zoonoses evolve and emerge as human pathogens is critical for anticipating and controlling both natural and deliberate pandemics. However, predicting tenable pathways of animal-to-human movement has been hindered by challenges in identifying reservoir species, cultivating zoonotic organisms in culture, and isolating full-length genomes for cloning and genetic studies. The ability to design and recover pathogens reconstituted from synthesized cDNAs has the potential to overcome these obstacles by allowing studies of replication and pathogenesis without identification of reservoir species or cultivation of primary isolates. Here, we report the design, synthesis, and recovery of the largest synthetic replicating life form, a 29.7-kb bat severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronavirus (Bat-SCoV), a likely progenitor to the SARS-CoV epidemic. To test a possible route of emergence from the noncultivable Bat-SCoV to human SARS-CoV, we designed a consensus Bat-SCoV genome and replaced the Bat-SCoV Spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) with the SARS-CoV RBD (Bat-SRBD). Bat-SRBD was infectious in cell culture and in mice and was efficiently neutralized by antibodies specific for both bat and human CoV Spike proteins. Rational design, synthesis, and recovery of hypothetical recombinant viruses can be used to investigate mechanisms of transspecies movement of zoonoses and has great potential to aid in rapid public health responses to known or predicted emerging microbial threats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome
Drosten, C., Günther, S., Preiser, W., van der Werf, S., Brodt, H.-R., Becker, S., Rabenau, H., Panning, M., Kolesnikova, L., Fouchier, R. A. M., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030747 · Cited by 4,574
Host Range and Emerging and Reemerging Pathogens
Woolhouse, M. E. J., & Gowtage-Sequeria, S. (2005) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1112.050997 · Cited by 1,586
Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus
Tumpey, T. M., Basler, C. F., Aguilar, P. V., Zeng, H., Solórzano, A., Swayne, D. E., Cox, N. J., Katz, J. M., Taubenberger, J. K., Palese, P., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119392 · Cited by 1,327
Cello, J., Paul, A. V., & Wimmer, E. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072266 · Cited by 980
Reconstitution of an Infectious Human Endogenous Retrovirus
Lee, Y. N., & Bieniasz, P. D. (2007) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0030010 · Cited by 311
Rockx, B., Corti, D., Donaldson, E., Sheahan, T., Stadler, K., Lanzavecchia, A., & Baric, R. (2008) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02377-07 · Cited by 134
Self-citation
Cited by
SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses
de Wit, E., van Doremalen, N., Falzarano, D., & Munster, V. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81 · Cited by 3,510
Letko, M., Marzi, A., & Munster, V. (2020) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y · Cited by 3,109
Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Hilton, S. K., Ellis, D., Crawford, K. H. D., Dingens, A. S., Navarro, M. J., Bowen, J. E., Tortorici, M. A., Walls, A. C., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.012 · Cited by 1,956
Monteil, V., Kwon, H., Prado, P., Hagelkrüys, A., Wimmer, R. A., Stahl, M., Leopoldi, A., Garreta, E., Hurtado del Pozo, C., Prosper, F., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.004 · Cited by 2,122
Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor
Ge, X.-Y., Li, J.-L., Yang, X.-L., Chmura, A. A., Zhu, G., Epstein, J. H., Mazet, J. K., Hu, B., Zhang, W., Peng, C., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12711 · Cited by 1,778
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, M. M., Graham, R. L., Donaldson, E. F., Rockx, B., Sims, A. C., Sheahan, T., Pickles, R. J., Corti, D., Johnston, R. E., Baric, R. S., & Denison, M. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-12-16
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 19944-19949
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2074618762
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0808116105
- The paper
- Becker, M. M., Graham, R. L., Donaldson, E. F., Rockx, B., Sims, A. C., Sheahan, T., Pickles, R. J., Corti, D., Johnston, R. E., Baric, R. S., & Denison, M. R. (2008). Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808116105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.