The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitive dependence of the motion of a legged robot on granular media
Open accessAbstract
Legged locomotion on flowing ground (e.g., granular media) is unlike locomotion on hard ground because feet experience both solid- and fluid-like forces during surface penetration. Recent bioinspired legged robots display speed relative to body size on hard ground comparable with high-performing organisms like cockroaches but suffer significant performance loss on flowing materials like sand. In laboratory experiments, we study the performance (speed) of a small (2.3 kg) 6-legged robot, SandBot, as it runs on a bed of granular media (1-mm poppy seeds). For an alternating tripod gait on the granular bed, standard gait control parameters achieve speeds at best 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the 2 body lengths/s (≈60 cm/s) for motion on hard ground. However, empirical adjustment of these control parameters away from the hard ground settings restores good performance, yielding top speeds of 30 cm/s. Robot speed depends sensitively on the packing fraction φ and the limb frequency ω, and a dramatic transition from rotary walking to slow swimming occurs when φ becomes small enough and/or ω large enough. We propose a kinematic model of the rotary walking mode based on generic features of penetration and slip of a curved limb in granular media. The model captures the dependence of robot speed on limb frequency and the transition between walking and swimming modes but highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the physics of granular media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RHex: A Simple and Highly Mobile Hexapod Robot
Saranli, U., Buehler, M., & Koditschek, D. E. (2001) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640122067570 · Cited by 1,322
Self-citation
Cited by
Undulatory Swimming in Sand: Subsurface Locomotion of the Sandfish Lizard
Maladen, R. D., Ding, Y., Li, C., & Goldman, D. I. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172490 · Cited by 437
Self-citationSpikes alone do not behavior make: why neuroscience needs biomechanics
Tytell, E., Holmes, P., & Cohen, A. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.017 · Cited by 135
Understanding Agent Complexity Through Affordances
Baker, B., & Roberts, S. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09748-7
“For example, a low center of mass, high friction feet, and more than two legs are morphological adaptations that combine well with prediction-based locomotion strategies like MPC by reducing the difficulty of the prediction problem (Johnson et al., 2012; Li et al., 2009).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Umbanhowar, P. B., Komsuoglu, H., Koditschek, D. E., & Goldman, D. I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-03-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3029-3034
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1992878443
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitive dependence of the motion of a legged robot on granular media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0809095106
- The paper
- Li, C., Umbanhowar, P. B., Komsuoglu, H., Koditschek, D. E., & Goldman, D. I. (2009). Sensitive dependence of the motion of a legged robot on granular media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809095106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.