Cited by 657Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Protection of synapses against Alzheimer's-linked toxins: Insulin signaling prevents the pathogenic binding of Aβ oligomers

Open access

Abstract

Synapse deterioration underlying severe memory loss in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) is thought to be caused by soluble amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomers. Mechanistically, soluble Aβ oligomers, also referred to as Aβ-derived diffusible ligands (ADDLs), act as highly specific pathogenic ligands, binding to sites localized at particular synapses. This binding triggers oxidative stress, loss of synaptic spines, and ectopic redistribution of receptors critical to plasticity and memory. We report here the existence of a protective mechanism that naturally shields synapses against ADDL-induced deterioration. Synapse pathology was investigated in mature cultures of hippocampal neurons. Before spine loss, ADDLs caused major downregulation of plasma membrane insulin receptors (IRs), via a mechanism sensitive to calcium calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) and casein kinase II (CK2) inhibition. Most significantly, this loss of surface IRs, and ADDL-induced oxidative stress and synaptic spine deterioration, could be completely prevented by insulin. At submaximal insulin doses, protection was potentiated by rosiglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing drug used to treat type 2 diabetes. The mechanism of insulin protection entailed a marked reduction in pathogenic ADDL binding. Surprisingly, insulin failed to block ADDL binding when IR tyrosine kinase activity was inhibited; in fact, a significant increase in binding was caused by IR inhibition. The protective role of insulin thus derives from IR signaling-dependent downregulation of ADDL binding sites rather than ligand competition. The finding that synapse vulnerability to ADDLs can be mitigated by insulin suggests that bolstering brain insulin signaling, which can decline with aging and diabetes, could have significant potential to slow or deter AD pathogenesis.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In mature hippocampal cultures, insulin signaling prevented Aβ oligomer (ADDL) binding, oxidative stress, insulin receptor loss, and spine degeneration, with protection requiring insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity rather than simple ligand competition. Rosiglitazone potentiated submaximal insulin’s protection, suggesting that enhancing CNS insulin signaling may defend synapses against Alzheimer’s-linked toxins.

Key findings

  • ADDLs caused loss of surface insulin receptors (IRs): surface-exposed IR levels decreased by 22% after 30 min and 68% after 3 h of exposure to 100 nM ADDLs.
  • The CK2 inhibitor DMAT completely blocked ADDL-induced loss of both IRs and NMDA receptors; the CaMKII inhibitor KN93 afforded partial protection.
  • Insulin at 100 nM partially prevented and 1 μM completely blocked ADDL-induced dendritic IR loss; 1 μM insulin caused a major (≈70%) blockade of ADDL binding, and 100 nM insulin + 10 μM rosiglitazone produced IR levels similar to control or 1 μM insulin.
  • Insulin prevented ADDL-induced oxidative stress and 24-h spine degeneration; protection required IR activity, because AG1024 (5 μM) abolished insulin’s ability to block ADDL binding and increased binding when added alone or with insulin.

Methods

  • Primary mature hippocampal neuronal cultures were used after 21 DIV and treated at 37 °C for 3 h with 100 nM ADDLs or vehicle; insulin (100 nM or 1 μM) or rosiglitazone (10 μM) was added 30 min before ADDLs, and AG1024 (5 μM) was added 30 min before insulin.
  • ADDLs were prepared from Aβ1–42; outcomes were assessed by surface biotinylation/Western blot, immunocytochemistry with IRα and NU4 anti-ADDL antibodies, phalloidin labeling of spines, and dihydroethidium (DHE) for reactive oxygen species.
  • Immunofluorescence intensities were analyzed with NIH ImageJ.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the nature of the ADDL binding sites “has yet to be determined” and that future identification of proteins lost from the membrane in response to insulin could provide insight into them.
  • Evident from the text: all experiments were performed in mature hippocampal neuronal cultures; no in vivo or human data are reported in this study.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0809158106

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 16 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 7
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 1
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
De Felice, F. G., Vieira, M. N. N., Bomfim, T. R., Decker, H., Velasco, P. T., Lambert, M. P., Viola, K. L., Zhao, W.-Q., Ferreira, S. T., & Klein, W. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; and
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Instituto de Bioquímica Médica and
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-02-10
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
1971-1976
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2097335530
Cited by
657
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 46
FWCI
31.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • American Health Assistance Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG022547, R01-AG22547, R01-AG18877, R01AG018877)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta oligomers, insulin signaling, insulin receptor, synaptic plasticity, oxidative stress, CaMKII, casein kinase 2, rosiglitazone, insulin receptor tyrosine kinase, hippocampal neurons, memory loss
MeSH terms
Rosiglitazone, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cattle, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Humans, Insulin, Neurons, Protein Binding, Receptor, Insulin, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Oxidative Stress, Dimerization, Protective Agents, Thiazolidinediones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review