The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytohormone-based activity mapping of insect herbivore-produced elicitors
Open accessAbstract
In response to insect attack, many plants exhibit dynamic biochemical changes, resulting in the induced production of direct and indirect defenses. Elicitors present in herbivore oral secretions are believed to positively regulate many inducible plant defenses; however, little is known about the specificity of elicitor recognition in plants. To investigate the phylogenic distribution of elicitor activity, we tested representatives from three different elicitor classes on the time course of defense-related phytohormone production, including ethylene (E), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid, in a range of plant species spanning angiosperm diversity. All families examined responded to at least one elicitor class with significant increases in E and JA production within 1 to 2 h after treatment, yet elicitation activity among species was highly idiosyncratic. The fatty-acid amino acid conjugate volicitin exhibited the widest range of phytohormone and volatile inducing activity, which spanned maize ( Zea mays ), soybean ( Glycine max ), and eggplant ( Solanum melongena ). In contrast, the activity of inceptin-related peptides, originally described in cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ), was limited even within the Fabaceae. Similarly, caeliferin A16:0, a disulfooxy fatty acid from grasshoppers, was the only elicitor with demonstrable activity in Arabidopsis thaliana . Although precise mechanisms remain unknown, the unpredictable nature of elicitor activity between plant species supports the existence of specific receptor-ligand interactions mediating recognition. Despite the lack of an ideal plant model for studying the action of numerous elicitors, E and JA exist as highly conserved and readily quantifiable markers for future discoveries in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Contrasting Mechanisms of Defense Against Biotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens
Glazebrook, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923 · Cited by 4,367
Induced Responses to Herbivory
Karban, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (1997) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226424972.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores
Howe, G. A., & Jander, G. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825 · Cited by 2,427
Defensive Function of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatile Emissions in Nature
Kessler, A., & Baldwin, I. T. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5511.2141 · Cited by 2,182
Exploitation of Herbivore-Induced Plant Odors by Host-Seeking Parasitic Wasps
Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H., & Lewis, W. J. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.250.4985.1251 · Cited by 1,713
Self-citationFeussner, I., & Wasternack, C. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135248 · Cited by 1,508
Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense
Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3 · Cited by 1,451
Differential Gene Expression in Response to Mechanical Wounding and Insect Feeding in Arabidopsis
Reymond, P., Weber, H., Damond, M., & Farmer, E. E. (2000) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.5.707 · Cited by 1,227
Genetic Design and Statistical Power of Nested Association Mapping in Maize
Yu, J., Holland, J. B., McMullen, M. D., & Buckler, E. S. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.074245 · Cited by 1,094
A Polypeptide from Tomato Leaves Induces Wound-Inducible Proteinase Inhibitor Proteins
Pearce, G., Strydom, D., Johnson, S., & Ryan, C. A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5022.895 · Cited by 1,079
Cited by
Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores
Fürstenberg-Hägg, J., Zagrobelny, M., & Bak, S. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140510242 · Cited by 929
The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies
Clavijo McCormick, A., Unsicker, S. B., & Gershenzon, J. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.012 · Cited by 566
Molecular Bases of Plant Resistance to Arthropods
Smith, C. M., & Clement, S. L. (2012) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100642 · Cited by 364
Kant, M. R., Jonckheere, W., Knegt, B., Lemos, F., Liu, J., Schimmel, B. C. J., Villarroel, C. A., Ataide, L. M. S., Dermauw, W., Glas, J. J., et al. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv054 · Cited by 360
Vadassery, J., Reichelt, M., Hause, B., Gershenzon, J., Boland, W., & Mithöfer, A. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.198150 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmelz, E. A., Engelberth, J., Alborn, H. T., Tumlinson, J. H., & Teal, P. E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-13
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 653-657
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2069519509
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 27.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytohormone-based activity mapping of insect herbivore-produced elicitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0811861106
- The paper
- Schmelz, E. A., Engelberth, J., Alborn, H. T., Tumlinson, J. H., & Teal, P. E. A. (2009). Phytohormone-based activity mapping of insect herbivore-produced elicitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811861106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.