The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of F-box genes in plants: Different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification
Open accessAbstract
F-box proteins are substrate-recognition components of the S kp1-Rbx1- C ul1- F -box protein (SCF) ubiquitin ligases. In plants, F-box genes form one of the largest multigene superfamilies and control many important biological functions. However, it is unclear how and why plants have acquired a large number of F-box genes. Here we identified 692, 337, and 779 F-box genes in Arabidopsis , poplar and rice, respectively, and studied their phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary patterns. We found that the plant F-box superfamily can be divided into 42 families, each of which has a distinct domain organization. We also estimated the number of ancestral genes for each family and identified highly conservative versus divergent families. In conservative families, there has been little or no change in the number of genes since the divergence between eudicots and monocots ≈145 million years ago. In divergent families, however, the numbers have increased dramatically during the same period. In two cases, the numbers of genes in extant species are >100 times greater than that in the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the three species. Proteins encoded by highly conservative genes always have the same domain organization, suggesting that they interact with the same or similar substrates. In contrast, proteins of rapidly duplicating genes sometimes have quite different domain structures, mainly caused by unusually frequent shifts of exon-intron boundaries and/or frameshift mutations. Our results indicate that different F-box families, or different clusters of the same family, have experienced dramatically different modes of sequence divergence, apparently having resulted in adaptive changes in function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
Self-citationEddy, S. R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · Cited by 5,515
Global variation in copy number in the human genome
Redon, R., Ishikawa, S., Fitch, K. R., Feuk, L., Perry, G. H., Andrews, T. D., Fiegler, H., Shapero, M. H., Carson, A. R., Chen, W., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05329 · Cited by 4,288
Structure of the Cul1–Rbx1–Skp1–F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex
Zheng, N., Schulman, B. A., Song, L., Miller, J. J., Jeffrey, P. D., Wang, P., Chu, C., Koepp, D. M., Elledge, S. J., Pagano, M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416703a · Cited by 1,507
Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree
Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., & Chase, M. W. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1782 · Cited by 1,506
THE UBIQUITIN 26S PROTEASOME PROTEOLYTIC PATHWAY
Smalle, J., & Vierstra, R. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141801 · Cited by 1,348
Concerted and Birth-and-Death Evolution of Multigene Families
Nei, M., & Rooney, A. P. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240 · Cited by 1,298
Self-citationSCF and Cullin/RING H2-Based Ubiquitin Ligases
Deshaies, R. J. (1999) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.435 · Cited by 1,242
Comparative Analysis of the Receptor-Like Kinase Family in Arabidopsis and Rice[W]
Shiu, S.-H., Karlowski, W. M., Pan, R., Tzeng, Y.-H., Mayer, K. F. X., & Li, W.-H. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.020834 · Cited by 1,139
Cited by
Yang, B.-J., Han, X.-X., Yin, L.-L., Xing, M.-Q., Xu, Z.-H., & Xue, H.-W. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11388 · Cited by 1,202
Divergence of duplicate genes in exon-intron structure
Xu, G., Guo, C., Shan, H., & Kong, H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109047109 · Cited by 1,072
Self-citationThe Cullin-RING Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
Hua, Z., & Vierstra, R. D. (2011) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112256 · Cited by 511
A mosaic monoploid reference sequence for the highly complex genome of sugarcane
Garsmeur, O., Droc, G., Antonise, R., Grimwood, J., Potier, B., Aitken, K., Jenkins, J., Martin, G., Charron, C., Hervouet, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05051-5 · Cited by 452
Evolution of Plant Hormone Response Pathways
Blázquez, M. A., Nelson, D. C., & Weijers, D. (2020) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100309 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, G., Ma, H., Nei, M., & Kong, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-20
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 835-840
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2137504876
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of F-box genes in plants: Different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0812043106
- The paper
- Xu, G., Ma, H., Nei, M., & Kong, H. (2009). Evolution of F-box genes in plants: Different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812043106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.