Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Jagged1 is the pathological link between Wnt and Notch pathways in colorectal cancer

Open access
Rodilla, Verónica, Villanueva, Alberto, Obrador-Hevia, Antonia, Robert-Moreno, Àlex, Fernández-Majada, Vanessa, Grilli, Andrea, López-Bigas, Nuria, Bellora, Nicolás, Albà, M. Mar, Torres, Ferran, Duñach, Mireia, Sanjuan, Xavier, Gonzalez, Sara, Gridley, Thomas, Capella, Gabriel, Bigas, Anna, Espinosa, Lluís·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Notch has been linked to β-catenin-dependent tumorigenesis; however, the mechanisms leading to Notch activation and the contribution of the Notch pathway to colorectal cancer is not yet understood. By microarray analysis, we have identified a group of genes downstream of Wnt/β-catenin (down-regulated when blocking Wnt/β-catenin) that are directly regulated by Notch (repressed by γ-secretase inhibitors and up-regulated by active Notch1 in the absence of β-catenin signaling). We demonstrate that Notch is downstream of Wnt in colorectal cancer cells through β-catenin-mediated transcriptional activation of the Notch-ligand Jagged1. Consistently, expression of activated Notch1 partially reverts the effects of blocking Wnt/β-catenin pathway in tumors implanted s.c. in nude mice. Crossing APC Min /+ with Jagged1 +/Δ mice is sufficient to significantly reduce the size of the polyps arising in the APC mutant background indicating that Notch is an essential modulator of tumorigenesis induced by nuclear β-catenin. We show that this mechanism is operating in human tumors from Familial Adenomatous Polyposis patients. We conclude that Notch activation, accomplished by β-catenin-mediated up-regulation of Jagged1, is required for tumorigenesis in the intestine. The Notch-specific genetic signature is sufficient to block differentiation and promote vasculogenesis in tumors whereas proliferation depends on both pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0813221106

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Rodilla, V., Villanueva, A., Obrador-Hevia, A., Robert-Moreno, À., Fernández-Majada, V., Grilli, A., López-Bigas, N., Bellora, N., Albà, M. M., Torres, F., Duñach, M., Sanjuan, X., Gonzalez, S., Gridley, T., Capella, G., Bigas, A., & Espinosa, L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-04-14
Volume
106
Issue
15
Pages
6315-6320
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2062150443
Cited by
384
References
55
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jagged1 is the pathological link between Wnt and Notch pathways in colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0813221106
The paper
Rodilla, V., Villanueva, A., Obrador-Hevia, A., Robert-Moreno, À., Fernández-Majada, V., Grilli, A., López-Bigas, N., Bellora, N., Albà, M. M., Torres, F., Duñach, M., Sanjuan, X., Gonzalez, S., Gridley, T., Capella, G., Bigas, A., & Espinosa, L. (2009). Jagged1 is the pathological link between Wnt and Notch pathways in colorectal cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813221106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.