Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cells previously identified as retinal stem cells are pigmented ciliary epithelial cells

Open access
Cicero, Samantha A., Johnson, Dianna, Reyntjens, Steve, Frase, Sharon, Connell, Samuel, Chow, Lionel M. L., Baker, Suzanne J., Sorrentino, Brian P., Dyer, Michael A.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

It was previously reported that the ciliary epithelium (CE) of the mammalian eye contains a rare population of cells that could produce clonogenic self-renewing pigmented spheres in culture. Based on their ability to up-regulate genes found in retinal neurons, it was concluded that these sphere-forming cells were retinal stem cells. This conclusion raised the possibility that CE-derived retinal stem cells could help to restore vision in the millions of people worldwide who suffer from blindness associated with retinal degeneration. We report here that human and mouse CE-derived spheres are made up of proliferating pigmented ciliary epithelial cells rather than retinal stem cells. All of the cells in the CE-derived spheres, including the proliferating cells, had molecular, cellular, and morphological features of differentiated pigmented CE cells. These differentiated cells ectopically expressed nestin when exposed to growth factors and low levels of pan-neuronal markers such as beta-III-tubulin. Although the cells aberrantly expressed neuronal markers, they retained their pigmented CE cell morphology and failed to differentiate into retinal neurons in vitro or in vivo. Our results provide an example of a differentiated cell type that can form clonogenic spheres in culture, self-renew, express progenitor cell markers, and initiate neuronal differentiation that is not a stem or progenitor cell. More importantly, our findings highlight the importance of shifting the focus away from studies on CE-derived spheres for cell-based therapies to restore vision in the degenerating retina and improving techniques for using ES cells or retinal precursor cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0901596106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Cicero, S. A., Johnson, D., Reyntjens, S., Frase, S., Connell, S., Chow, L. M. L., Baker, S. J., Sorrentino, B. P., & Dyer, M. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-04-21
Volume
106
Issue
16
Pages
6685-6690
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2101777616
Cited by
223
References
2
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cells previously identified as retinal stem cells are pigmented ciliary epithelial cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0901596106
The paper
Cicero, S. A., Johnson, D., Reyntjens, S., Frase, S., Connell, S., Chow, L. M. L., Baker, S. J., Sorrentino, B. P., & Dyer, M. A. (2009). Cells previously identified as retinal stem cells are pigmented ciliary epithelial cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901596106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.