Cited by 149Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Graded synaptic transmission at the Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction

Open access
Liu, Qiang, Hollopeter, Gunther, Jorgensen, Erik M.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Most neurotransmission is mediated by action potentials, whereas sensory neurons propagate electrical signals passively and release neurotransmitter in a graded manner. Here, we demonstrate that Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junctions release neurotransmitter in a graded fashion. When motor neurons were depolarized by light-activation of channelrhodopsin-2, the evoked postsynaptic current scaled with the strength of the stimulation. When motor neurons were hyperpolarized by light-activation of halorhodopsin, tonic release of synaptic vesicles was decreased. These data suggest that both evoked and tonic neurotransmitter release is graded in response to membrane potential. Acetylcholine synapses are depressed by high-frequency stimulation, in part due to desensitization of the nicotine-sensitve ACR-16 receptor. By contrast, GABA synapses facilitate before becoming depressed. Graded transmission and plasticity confer a broad dynamic range to these synapses. Graded release precisely transmits stimulation intensity, even hyperpolarizing inputs. Synaptic plasticity alters the balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs into the muscle in a use-dependent manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0903570106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent publication by Liu et al. (2009) provides the first characterization of the C. elegans body wall neuromuscular junction response to optogenetic activation and inhibition of B-class neurons.

    “A recent publication by Liu et al. (2009) provides the first characterization of the C. elegans body wall neuromuscular junction (NMJ) response to optogenetic activation and inhibition of B-class neurons.”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2009

  • Liu et al. found that the postsynaptic current increases smoothly with increasing light intensity and is reduced by halorhodopsin inhibition.

    “They found that the postsynaptic current increases smoothly as shown in Figure 8A. Liu et al. also used halorhodopsin, a light activated hyperpolarizing ion channel, to inhibit the presynaptic neuron, finding that the postsynaptic current is reduced.”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2009

  • The data of Liu et al. (2009) are consistent with the bistable B-class neuron dynamics.

    “While this model cannot be used conclusively to infer a single model of B-class neurons (or even to rule out passive behavior of these neurons), we can conclude that the data of Liu et al. (2009) are consistent with the bistable B-class neuron dynamics.”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Q., Hollopeter, G., & Jorgensen, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
106
Issue
26
Pages
10823-10828
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2140685510
Cited by
149
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (NS034307)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS034307, NS034307, R01NS034307)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
neuromuscular junction, Caenorhabditis elegans, neurotransmitter release, evoked release, GABAergic synapses, synaptic plasticity, channelrhodopsin-2, halorhodopsin, hyperpolarization, synaptic depression, sensory neurons
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Light, Membrane Potentials, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Motor Neurons, Synaptic Transmission, Neuromuscular Junction, Neuronal Plasticity, Caenorhabditis elegans, Neurotransmitter Agents, Sensory Rhodopsins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review