Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A chemical-genetic approach to study G protein regulation of β cell function in vivo

Open access
Guettier, Jean-Marc, Gautam, Dinesh, Scarselli, Marco, de Azua, Inigo Ruiz, Li, Jian Hua, Rosemond, Erica, Ma, Xiaochao, Gonzalez, Frank J., Armbruster, Blaine N., Lu, Huiyan, Roth, Bryan L., Wess, Jürgen·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Impaired functioning of pancreatic β cells is a key hallmark of type 2 diabetes. β cell function is modulated by the actions of different classes of heterotrimeric G proteins. The functional consequences of activating specific β cell G protein signaling pathways in vivo are not well understood at present, primarily due to the fact that β cell G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are also expressed by many other tissues. To circumvent these difficulties, we developed a chemical-genetic approach that allows for the conditional and selective activation of specific β cell G proteins in intact animals. Specifically, we created two lines of transgenic mice each of which expressed a specific designer GPCR in β cells only. Importantly, the two designer receptors differed in their G protein-coupling properties (G q/11 versus G s ). They were unable to bind endogenous ligand(s), but could be efficiently activated by an otherwise pharmacologically inert compound (clozapine-N-oxide), leading to the conditional activation of either β cell G q/11 or G s G proteins. Here we report the findings that conditional and selective activation of β cell G q/11 signaling in vivo leads to striking increases in both first- and second-phase insulin release, greatly improved glucose tolerance in obese, insulin-resistant mice, and elevated β cell mass, associated with pathway-specific alterations in islet gene expression levels. Selective stimulation of β cell G s triggered qualitatively similar in vivo metabolic effects. Thus, this developed chemical-genetic strategy represents a powerful approach to study G protein regulation of β cell function in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0906593106

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Guettier, J.-M., Gautam, D., Scarselli, M., de Azua, I. R., Li, J. H., Rosemond, E., Ma, X., Gonzalez, F. J., Armbruster, B. N., Lu, H., Roth, B. L., & Wess, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-11-10
Volume
106
Issue
45
Pages
19197-19202
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2073769248
Cited by
344
References
23
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A chemical-genetic approach to study G protein regulation of β cell function in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0906593106
The paper
Guettier, J.-M., Gautam, D., Scarselli, M., de Azua, I. R., Li, J. H., Rosemond, E., Ma, X., Gonzalez, F. J., Armbruster, B. N., Lu, H., Roth, B. L., & Wess, J. (2009). A chemical-genetic approach to study G protein regulation of β cell function in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906593106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.