Cited by 239Genetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic ResearchPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ancient DNA analyses exclude humans as the driving force behind late Pleistocene musk ox ( Ovibos moschatus ) population dynamics

Open access

Abstract

The causes of the late Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions are poorly understood. Different lines of evidence point to climate change, the arrival of humans, or a combination of these events as the trigger. Although many species went extinct, others, such as caribou and bison, survived to the present. The musk ox has an intermediate story: relatively abundant during the Pleistocene, it is now restricted to Greenland and the Arctic Archipelago. In this study, we use ancient DNA sequences, temporally unbiased summary statistics, and Bayesian analytical techniques to infer musk ox population dynamics throughout the late Pleistocene and Holocene. Our results reveal that musk ox genetic diversity was much higher during the Pleistocene than at present, and has undergone several expansions and contractions over the past 60,000 years. Northeast Siberia was of key importance, as it was the geographic origin of all samples studied and held a large diverse population until local extinction at ≈45,000 radiocarbon years before present ( 14 C YBP). Subsequently, musk ox genetic diversity reincreased at ca. 30,000 14 C YBP, recontracted at ca. 18,000 14 C YBP, and finally recovered in the middle Holocene. The arrival of humans into relevant areas of the musk ox range did not affect their mitochondrial diversity, and both musk ox and humans expanded into Greenland concomitantly. Thus, their population dynamics are better explained by a nonanthropogenic cause (for example, environmental change), a hypothesis supported by historic observations on the sensitivity of the species to both climatic warming and fluctuations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0907189107

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. PS Martin, Pre-historic over kill. Pleistocene Extinctions: The Search for a Cause (Proceedings of the VII Congress of the International Association for Quaternary Research), eds PS Martin, HE Wright (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), pp. 75–120 (1967).
  2. NK Vereshchagin, Prehistoric hunting and the extinction of Pleistocene mammals in the USSR. Proceedings of the Zoological Instititute of the USSR Academy of Sciences 69, 200–232 (1971).
  3. TV Kuznetsova, LD Sulerzhitsky, C Siegert, L Schirrmeister, New data on the “mammoth” fauna of the Laptev Shelf Land (Arctic Siberia). The World of Elephants, eds G Cavarretta, P Giola, M Mussi, MR Palombo, Roma, 16–20 October 2001, pp 289-292. (2001).
  4. A Gunn, Aspects of the management of muskoxen in the Northwest Territories. First International Muskox Symposium, eds DR Klein, RG White, S Keller (Malloy Lithographing, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 33–40 (1984).
  5. LA Orlova, YV Kuzmin, ID Zolnikov, Time–space systematics for mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius Blum.) and prehistoric humans in Siberia (on the basis of radiocarbon dating). Archaeol Ethnol Anthropol Eurasia 1, 31–41 (2000).
  6. M Meldgaard, New perspectives on the zoogeography of the Greenlandic caribou (Rangifer tarandus). 4th North American Caribou Workshop, eds C Butler, SP Mahoney (Newfoundland and Labrador Wildlife Division, St. John’s, Newfoundland), pp. 37–63 (1991).
  7. E Knuth, Greenland news from between 81° and 83° north. Folk 23, 91–111 (1981).
  8. R Alley GISP2 Ice Core Temperature and Accumulation Data (IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology NOAA/NGDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder, CO, 2004).
  9. HC Gulløv Grønlands Forhistorie (Gyldendal, Copenhagen), pp. 434 (2004).
  10. P Lemey, A Rambaut, AJ Drummond, MA Suchard, Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Comput Biol 5, e1000520 (2009). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 238

Metadata

Authors
Campos, P. F., Willerslev, E., Sher, A., Orlando, L., Axelsson, E., Tikhonov, A., Aaris-Sørensen, K., Greenwood, A. D., Kahlke, R.-D., Kosintsev, P., Krakhmalnaya, T., Kuznetsova, T., Lemey, P., MacPhee, R., Norris, C. A., Shepherd, K., Suchard, M. A., Zazula, G. D., Shapiro, B., & Gilbert, M. T. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Zoological Institute (RU)
  • Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark;
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Senckenberg Research Institutes and Natural History Museums, Research Station of Quaternary Palaeontology, D-99423 Weimar, Germany;
  • Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (RU)
  • National Museum of Natural History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • American Museum of Natural History (US)
  • Yale Peabody Museum (US)
  • Canadian Museum of Nature (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Yukon Department of Tourism and Culture (CA)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-03-08
Volume
107
Issue
12
Pages
5675-5680
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2046767641
Cited by
239
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 26
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R70-2010-6286, R24-2008-2527)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM086887)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
Ovibos moschatus, human impact on extinction, population dynamics, genetic diversity, mitochondrial DNA, climate change, reindeer, bison
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, DNA, Mitochondrial, Fossils, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Population Dynamics, Ruminants, Genetic Variation, History, Ancient, Extinction, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review